Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Are hydrostatic and pneumatic methods of intussusception reduction comparable?

M A Sargent1, B P Wilson

  • 1Department of Radiology, Booth Hall Children's Hospital, Manchester, UK.

Pediatric Radiology
|January 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary

Pediatric radiologists underestimated contrast height for intussusception reduction. Hydrostatic reduction pressures are lower than pneumatic reduction, potentially explaining air enema

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Some Observations on the Use of Acetozone.

Atlanta journal-record of medicine·2022
Same author

MR Imaging of Pediatric Low-Grade Gliomas: Pretherapeutic Differentiation of <i>BRAF</i> V600E Mutation, <i>BRAF</i> Fusion, and Wild-Type Tumors in Patients without Neurofibromatosis-1.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2022
Same author

High order harmonic generation from SF<sub>6</sub>: Deconvolution of macroscopic effects.

The Journal of chemical physics·2016
Same author

Genetic deletion of the mitochondrial phosphate carrier desensitizes the mitochondrial permeability transition pore and causes cardiomyopathy.

Cell death and differentiation·2014
Same author

Weight and glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes: what is the outcome of insulin initiation?

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism·2011
Same author

Pattern of recurrence in children with midline posterior fossa malignant neoplasms.

Pediatric radiology·2000

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Gastroenterology

Background:

  • Intussusception reduction commonly uses hydrostatic or pneumatic methods.
  • Contrast agents like barium sulfate and water-soluble contrast are used in hydrostatic reduction.
  • Accurate pressure and flow rate management are crucial for successful reduction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To measure hydrostatic pressures and flow rates of contrast agents during intussusception reduction.
  • To assess the accuracy of estimations by pediatric specialists regarding contrast height.
  • To compare hydrostatic reduction parameters with those recommended for pneumatic reduction.

Main Methods:

  • Measurement of hydrostatic pressures and flow rates for barium sulfate and water-soluble contrast.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessment of fluid discharge height from a filled kit.
  • Evaluation of estimations by experienced pediatric radiologists and radiographers on contrast height.

    • Main Results:

    • Experienced pediatric specialists underestimated the required contrast height for intussusception reduction.
    • Baseline and maximum hydrostatic reduction pressures were lower than those advocated for pneumatic reduction.
    • Hydrostatic reduction demonstrated lower flow rates compared to pneumatic methods.

    Conclusions:

    • The lower pressures and flow rates in hydrostatic reduction may explain improved success rates with air enema.
    • Intraluminal pressure monitoring can aid hydrostatic reduction control.
    • Standardized contrast density and height are recommended for consistent hydrostatic reduction pressure.