Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Vessel-sparing Excision and Primary Anastomosis
Published on: January 7, 2019
[Long-term results of treatment of vesicoureteral refluxes]
Małgorzata Pańczyk-Tomaszewska1, Piotr Skrzypczyk, Hanna Szymanik-Grzelak
1Katedra i Klinika Pediatrii i Nefrologii Warszawskiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego. nefrologia@litewska.edu.pl
Insights
Treatment for pediatric vesicoureteral refluxes (VUR) showed no impact on kidney function or hypertension. Surgical intervention correlated with higher VUR grades and renal scarring.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Urology
- Nephrology
- Surgical Outcomes
Context:
- Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is a common condition in children.
- Evaluating treatment outcomes is crucial for long-term renal health.
- Various treatment modalities exist, including surgical, injection-based, and conservative approaches.
Purpose:
- To assess the effectiveness of different vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) treatments in children.
- To compare outcomes based on VUR subsidence, kidney function, renal scarring, and hypertension.
Summary:
- 156 children with VUR were studied; 68 aged 10+ were analyzed in detail across surgical, injection, and conservative groups.
- Surgical treatment showed no VUR persistence, while conservative and injection methods had 19.4% and 9.1% persistence, respectively.
- Operated patients had higher VUR grades and renal scarring, but no significant differences in kidney function or hypertension were noted between groups.
Impact:
- Treatment method for VUR does not significantly affect long-term kidney function or the development of hypertension.
- Understanding treatment-specific outcomes aids in clinical decision-making for pediatric VUR management.
- Higher VUR grades and scarring in surgically treated patients warrant further investigation.
Aim Of The Study:
To estimate the results of treatment of vesicoureteral refluxes (VUR) in children. 156 children were involved into the study. 68 children aged 10 years and above (mean age 13.1 +/- 2.4 years) were analysed in detail. The patients were divided into groups depending on method of treatment: surgical (26 children), transurethral injection of teflon/collagen (11 children), conservative (31 children). The results of treatment were evaluated on basis of subsidence of VUR, kidney function, renal scarring on DMSA scan and arterial hypertension.
Results:
Persistence of VUR was observed in 6 patients treated conservatively (19.4%), 5 of them had voiding disturbances, in 1 patient treated with injections (9.1%) and in no operated patients. There was no significant difference between groups in kidney function and in presence of hypertension. Operated patients had significantly higher grade of VUR and grade of renal scarring on DMSA scan.
Conclusion:
Method of treatment of vesicoureteral refluxes does not influence kidney function or occurence of hypertension.
Related Concept Videos
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management
Urinary Tract Calculi III: Medical Management
Imaging Studies VI: Voiding Cystourethrography and Cystography
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Urinary Tract Infection IV: Nursing Management
