Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Blinding01:11

Blinding

Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
Censoring Survival Data01:09

Censoring Survival Data

Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different reasons...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which child was...
Group Design02:01

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Musicians have an advantage on a spatial-hearing task only when they are highly trained, start training early, and continue to play.

Hearing research·2024
Same author

Steep temporal integration for tone detection in a multi-tone, random-frequency masker.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2023
Same author

Auditory discrimination of natural soundscapes.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2023
Same author

Discrimination thresholds for interaural-time differences and interaural-level differences in naïve listeners: Sex differences and learning.

Hearing research·2022
Same author

Humans attend to signal duration but not temporal structure for sound detection: Steady-state versus pulse-train signals.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2021
Same author

On averaging multiple estimates of decision weights within or across listeners.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2018
Same journal

Response organization in selective adaptation to speech sounds.

Perception & psychophysics·2014
Same journal

Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Simple and contingent adaptation effects for place of articulation in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory property detectors and processing place features in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities.

Perception & psychophysics·2008
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

On suppressing unwanted cues via randomization.

Huanping Dai1

  • 1Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Arizona, 1131 E. 2nd St., Tucson, AZ 85721, USA. hdai@email.arizona.edu

Perception & Psychophysics
|October 18, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Randomizing stimuli uniformly is the most effective method for controlling unwanted perceptual cues in discrimination tasks. This technique ensures that participants rely on the intended stimulus dimension for accurate perception.

More Related Videos

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
14:34

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

Published on: November 10, 2010

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
14:34

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

Published on: November 10, 2010

Area of Science:

  • Perceptual psychology
  • Psychophysics
  • Decision making

Background:

  • Perceptual discrimination tasks can involve multiple stimulus variables.
  • Correlated perceptual cues can confound results in discrimination studies.
  • Controlling unwanted cues is crucial for isolating specific perceptual dimensions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a mathematical proof for controlling unwanted perceptual cues.
  • To demonstrate the efficacy of uniform randomization in perceptual tasks.
  • To provide a theoretical basis for experimental design in psychophysics.

Main Methods:

  • Mathematical modeling of perceptual discrimination.
  • Analysis of stimulus-response relationships under cue variation.
  • Proof by mathematical derivation.

Main Results:

  • Uniform randomization effectively suppresses the influence of unwanted perceptual cues.
  • This method ensures that discrimination is based on the intended stimulus dimension.
  • The mathematical proof confirms the optimal nature of uniform randomization.

Conclusions:

  • Uniform randomization is the most effective strategy for controlling extraneous cues in perceptual discrimination.
  • This finding has significant implications for experimental design in psychology and neuroscience.
  • Researchers can confidently apply uniform randomization to enhance the validity of their findings.