Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026
Techniques of Endoscopic Ossiculoplasty
Published on: January 26, 2024
The effect of the palatoplasty method on the frequency of ear tube placement
Lynnelle K Smith1, Samuel P Gubbels, Carol J MacArthur
1Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR 97239-3098, USA.
Insights
Double-opposing Z-plasty for cleft palate repair resulted in fewer ventilation tube placements compared to traditional 2-flap palatoplasty. This suggests Z-plasty may reduce the need for subsequent ear tube insertion in children.
Area of Science:
- Otolaryngology
- Pediatric Surgery
- Craniofacial Surgery
Background:
- Cleft palate repair is a common pediatric surgical procedure.
- Otitis media and eustachian tube dysfunction are frequent complications following palatoplasty.
- Ventilation tube placement is often necessary to manage these middle ear issues.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of different palate repair techniques on the need for ventilation tube placement.
- To compare the frequency of ear tube insertion after traditional 2-flap palatoplasty versus double-opposing Z-plasty.
Main Methods:
- A combined retrospective and prospective cohort study was conducted.
- 170 patients undergoing palatoplasty between 1995 and 2003 were included.
- Surgical techniques compared were traditional 2-flap palatoplasty and double-opposing Z-plasty.
Main Results:
- Patients undergoing double-opposing Z-plasty required an average of 1.8 sets of ventilation tubes.
- Patients undergoing traditional 2-flap palatoplasty required an average of 2.9 sets of ventilation tubes.
- The difference in ventilation tube placement between the two groups was statistically significant (P < .001).
Conclusions:
- Double-opposing Z-plasty is associated with a lower frequency of postoperative ventilation tube placement compared to traditional 2-flap palatoplasty.
- This finding suggests that the double-opposing Z-plasty technique may offer advantages in reducing middle ear complications after cleft palate repair.
Objective:
To determine whether the type of palate repair affects the frequency of subsequent ventilation tube placement.
Design:
Combined retrospective and prospective cohort with more than 2 years clinical follow-up after palatoplasty.
Setting:
Tertiary care children's hospital and clinic.
Patients:
A total of 170 patients with cleft palate (with or without cleft lip) underwent palatoplasty between 1995 and 2003. Sixty-nine patients with less than 2 years of follow-up visits and 1 patient who did not require ear tubes were excluded from this analysis.
Interventions:
Either traditional 2-flap palatoplasty (group A) or double-opposing Z-plasty (group B) was performed. The type of palatoplasty performed was based on the reconstructive surgeon's clinical decision. Ventilation tubes were placed for otitis media, conductive hearing loss, or eustachian tube dysfunction. Patients received routine follow-up care every 6 months or whenever acute problems arose. Data were analyzed with independent t tests, chi(2) tests, and Fisher exact tests.
Main Outcome Measures:
Number of ear tubes placed after palatoplasty in each group.
Results:
Group A had a mean (SE) of 2.9 (0.2) sets of tubes placed, while group B had a mean (SE) of 1.8 (0.2) sets of tubes. Group A had significantly more sets of ventilation tubes placed (P < .001) than group B. Subgroup analysis based on type of cleft was performed.
Conclusion:
Children with cleft palate who underwent double-opposing Z-plasty had fewer sets of ear tubes placed postoperatively than patients who had traditional repair.
