Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026
Enhancing Prostate Tumor Biobanking Reliability with Improved Sampling Technique and Histological Characterization
Published on: November 17, 2023
[Reusable versus disposable biopsy forceps: an economic comparison]
E Jörgensen1, C Busch, R Ujlaky
1Gastroenterologisch-hepatologische Facharztpraxis, Remscheid. info@gastroenterologie-remscheid.de
Abstract:
In addition to the risk of patient infections during endoscopy, such as trichosporon and hepatitis C, the use of reusable forceps also carries the risk of misdiagnosis caused by residues of contaminated tissue from previous patients. Disposable forceps can eliminate these risks. However, the use of disposable materials raises the question of the associated costs. Following the recommendations of the Robert Koch Institute concerning the reuse of medical instruments, this paper presents an analysis of the costs associated with reusable forceps during endoscopic procedures. This analysis allows for a direct comparison between disposable and reusable tools.
Insights
Reusable endoscopic forceps pose infection and misdiagnosis risks. This study analyzes costs, comparing disposable versus reusable instruments to inform safer, cost-effective choices in medical procedures.
Area of Science:
- Medical Device Safety
- Health Economics
- Infectious Disease Control
Background:
- Reusable endoscopic forceps risk patient infections (e.g., trichosporon, hepatitis C) and misdiagnosis due to residual tissue.
- Contaminated instruments pose a significant threat to patient safety during endoscopic procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the costs associated with reusable forceps in endoscopic procedures.
- To provide a direct cost comparison between disposable and reusable endoscopic forceps.
- To inform decisions regarding instrument selection based on safety and economic factors.
Main Methods:
- Cost analysis of reusable forceps based on Robert Koch Institute guidelines.
- Comparative assessment of economic implications for disposable versus reusable endoscopic tools.
Main Results:
- The study quantifies the financial aspects of using reusable forceps.
- Direct comparison data is provided to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of disposable alternatives.
Conclusions:
- Disposable forceps eliminate infection and misdiagnosis risks linked to reusable instruments.
- The cost-benefit analysis supports informed decision-making for endoscopic procedure instrument selection.
