Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
In pursuit of knowledge: comparing self-explanations, concepts, and procedures as pedagogical tools
Percival Matthews1, Bethany Rittle-Johnson
1Department of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Peabody 422, 230 Appleton Place, Nashville, TN 37203, USA. percival.g.matthews@vanderbilt.edu
Abstract:
Explaining new ideas to oneself can promote learning and transfer, but questions remain about how to maximize the pedagogical value of self-explanations. This study investigated how type of instruction affected self-explanation quality and subsequent learning outcomes for second- through fifth-grade children learning to solve mathematical equivalence problems (e.g., 7 + 3 + 9 = 7 + _ ). Experiment 1 varied whether instruction was conceptual or procedural in nature (n=40), and Experiment 2 varied whether children were prompted to self-explain after conceptual instruction (n=48). Conceptual instruction led to higher quality explanations, greater conceptual knowledge, and similar procedural knowledge compared with procedural instruction. No effect was found for self-explanation prompts. Conceptual instruction can be more efficient than procedural instruction and may make self-explanation prompts unnecessary.
Related Concept Videos
Metacognition
Introspection
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Understanding Self-Concept
Natural and Artificial Concepts
Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development from Childhood into Adulthood
Schemata: Building Blocks of Knowledge
Schemata...

