Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
ARB candesartan and CCB amlodipine in hypertensive patients: the CASE-J trial
Toshio Ogihara1, Akira Fujimoto, Kazuwa Nakao
1Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.
Insights
The Candesartan Antihypertensive Survival Evaluation in Japan (CASE-J) trial found no significant difference in cardiovascular events between candesartan (angiotensin II receptor blocker) and amlodipine (calcium channel blocker). However, candesartan showed benefits for left ventricular hypertrophy and reduced new-onset diabetes risk.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Pharmacology
- Hypertension Research
Background:
- High-risk Japanese hypertensive patients require effective treatments to prevent cardiovascular events.
- Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are common antihypertensive drug classes.
- Comparative data on long-term cardiovascular outcomes between ARBs and CCBs in Japanese populations are limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the incidence of cardiovascular events between candesartan (ARB) and amlodipine (CCB) in high-risk Japanese hypertensive patients.
- To evaluate the effects of candesartan versus amlodipine on left ventricular hypertrophy and new-onset diabetes.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, active-controlled trial (CASE-J) involving 4728 high-risk Japanese hypertensive patients.
- Patients were assigned to either candesartan- or amlodipine-based treatment regimens with response-dependent dose titration.
- Blinded assessment of endpoints over a mean follow-up of 3.2 years.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in the primary incidence of cardiovascular events between candesartan and amlodipine groups (HR: 1.01, p=0.969).
- Candesartan group showed a significantly greater reduction in left ventricular mass index compared to amlodipine in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (p=0.023).
- Fewer patients in the candesartan group developed new-onset diabetes compared to the amlodipine group (36% relative risk reduction, p=0.030).
Conclusions:
- Both candesartan (ARB) and amlodipine (CCB) are equally effective in suppressing the incidence of cardiovascular events in high-risk Japanese hypertensive patients.
- Candesartan may offer additional benefits over amlodipine in reducing left ventricular mass and the risk of developing new-onset diabetes.
- ARB-based therapy could be a preferred option for hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy or at risk for diabetes.
Abstract:
The Candesartan Antihypertensive Survival Evaluation in Japan (CASE-J) trial was a comparative study of the angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), candesartan, and a calcium channel blocker (CCB), amlodipine, regarding the incidence of cardiovascular events in high-risk Japanese hypertensive patients. The study design was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, two-arm, parallel-group comparison study with a response-dependent dose titration and blinded assessment of the end point. The CASE-J trial enrolled 4728 patients, with a mean age of 63.8 years and a mean BMI of 24.6 kg/m(2), who were randomly assigned to either candesartan- or amlodipine-based treatment regimens. Blood pressure was well controlled to the level of less than 140/80 mmHg in both of the treatment regimens. During 3.2 years of follow-up, primary cardiovascular events occurred in 134 patients in each of the two treatment-based regimens, resulting in no significant difference in the incidence of cardiovascular events between them (hazard ratio: 1.01; 95% confidence interval: 0.79-1.28; p = 0.969). In 404 patients with left ventricular hypertrophy, a significantly larger decrease in left ventricular mass index 3 years after enrollment was observed in candesartan-based (n = 205) than amlodipine-based (n = 199) regimens (-22.9 vs -13.4 g/m(2), respectively; p = 0.023). Furthermore, new-onset diabetes occurred in fewer patients taking candesartan than in those taking amlodipine, resulting in a 36% relative risk reduction (p = 0.030). The CASE-J trial demonstrated that both an ARB, candesartan, and a CCB, amlodipine, equally suppressed the incidence of cardiovascular events. The ARB may confer more beneficial effects to hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy or for those at-risk of diabetes than CCB.
Related Concept Videos
Antihypertensive Drugs: Direct Renin Inhibitors
Antihypertensive Drugs: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
Antihypertensive Drugs: Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Hypertension IV: Drug Therapy and Lifestyle Modifications
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Calcium Channel Blockers
TKIs, such as imatinib (Gleevec), are particularly effective in tackling the growth and mitogenic factors that become upregulated in PAH patients. These factors contribute to the...