Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Modern Molecular Taxonomy01:29

Modern Molecular Taxonomy

Advancements in molecular biology have revolutionized the identification and characterization of bacteria, with multiple methods leveraging DNA sequencing for enhanced precision. As sequencing technologies improve and costs decline, these approaches are increasingly used in clinical, environmental, and evolutionary studies.Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) examines several housekeeping genes, essential chromosomal genes encoding cellular functions, to distinguish strains. Approximately...
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
Coordination of Gene Expression Processes in Bacteria01:29

Coordination of Gene Expression Processes in Bacteria

The DNA replication, transcription, and translation processes are intricately coupled in bacteria, allowing efficient gene expression and rapid protein synthesis. While this physical and functional coordination is advantageous, it introduces challenges that bacteria overcome through specific regulatory mechanisms.Coupling of Replication, Transcription, and TranslationThe coupling of replication, transcription, and translation is a hallmark of bacterial gene expression. As the replisome unwinds...
Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes02:16

Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes

The present-day mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes have retained some of the characteristics of their ancestral prokaryotes and also have acquired new attributes during their evolution within eukaryotic cells. Like prokaryotic genomes, mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes neither bind with histone-like proteins nor show complex packaging into chromosome-like structures, as observed in eukaryotes. Unlike mitotic cell divisions observed in eukaryotic cells, mitochondria and chloroplasts...
Transfer RNA Synthesis02:36

Transfer RNA Synthesis

One of the unique features of tRNA is the presence of modified bases. In some tRNAs, modified bases account for nearly 20% of the total bases in the molecule. Altogether, these unusual bases protect the tRNA from enzymatic degradation by RNases.
Each of these chemical modifications is carried by a specific enzyme, post-transcription. All of these enzymes have unique base and site-specificity. Methylation, the most common chemical modification, is carried by at least nine different enzymes, with...
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs02:26

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs

Sequencing of the human genome has opened up several best-kept secrets of the genome. Scientists have identified thousands of genome variations that exist within a population. These variations can be a single nucleotide or a larger chromosomal variation.
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Shotgun metagenomic dataset of surface microbiomes at a train station in Shinagawa, Tokyo.

BMC genomic data·2026
Same author

Not So Mosaic After All? The Core Genomes of IncP-1 Plasmids Evolve Predominantly Through Vertical Transmission.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Editorial: Resources for developing plasmid databases.

Frontiers in microbiology·2025
Same author

Enhancing plasmid typing with MOB-typer: resolving IncP and other incompatibility group misclassifications in <i>Pseudomonas</i>.

Microbial genomics·2025
Same author

Insights from public database sequences related to the replication initiation protein TrfA of the IncP-1 plasmid RK2.

Plasmid·2025
Same author

Successful Endovascular Entry Closure for Retrograde Type A Aortic Dissection Originating from the Right Subclavian Artery: A Case Report.

Annals of vascular diseases·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 28, 2026

High-Resolution Comparison of Bacterial Conjugation Frequencies
05:18

High-Resolution Comparison of Bacterial Conjugation Frequencies

Published on: January 10, 2019

Comparison of correspondence analysis methods for synonymous codon usage in bacteria.

Haruo Suzuki1, Celeste J Brown, Larry J Forney

  • 1Department of Biological Sciences and Initiative for Bioinformatics and Evolutionary Studies, University of Idaho, PO Box 443051, Moscow, Idaho 83844-3051, USA. hsuzuki@uidaho.edu

DNA Research : an International Journal for Rapid Publication of Reports on Genes and Genomes
|October 23, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Within-group correspondence analysis (WCA) effectively reveals variations in synonymous codon usage across bacterial genomes. This method surpasses others, including relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU), in identifying usage patterns.

More Related Videos

Digital PCR-based Competitive Index for High-throughput Analysis of Fitness in Salmonella
07:11

Digital PCR-based Competitive Index for High-throughput Analysis of Fitness in Salmonella

Published on: May 13, 2019

A Method to Assess Bacteriocin Effects on the Gut Microbiota of Mice
07:54

A Method to Assess Bacteriocin Effects on the Gut Microbiota of Mice

Published on: July 25, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 28, 2026

High-Resolution Comparison of Bacterial Conjugation Frequencies
05:18

High-Resolution Comparison of Bacterial Conjugation Frequencies

Published on: January 10, 2019

Digital PCR-based Competitive Index for High-throughput Analysis of Fitness in Salmonella
07:11

Digital PCR-based Competitive Index for High-throughput Analysis of Fitness in Salmonella

Published on: May 13, 2019

A Method to Assess Bacteriocin Effects on the Gut Microbiota of Mice
07:54

A Method to Assess Bacteriocin Effects on the Gut Microbiota of Mice

Published on: July 25, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Molecular Evolution

Background:

  • Synonymous codon usage (SCU) varies across organisms and genes due to factors like G+C content, replication strand skew, and gene expression.
  • Correspondence analysis (CA) is a common bioinformatics tool used to analyze SCU patterns and identify genes with unusual usage, such as horizontally transferred or highly expressed genes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness of four different CA methods for analyzing SCU variation in bacterial genomes.
  • To compare the performance of within-group CA (WCA) against other established CA methods, including those based on absolute codon frequency, relative codon frequency, and relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU).

Main Methods:

  • Applied four CA methods (absolute codon frequency, relative codon frequency, RSCU-based CA, and WCA) to analyze SCU in 241 bacterial genome sequences.
  • Evaluated the ability of each method to generate axes that accurately reflect variations in synonymous codon usage.

Main Results:

  • Within-group CA (WCA) demonstrated superior effectiveness in identifying major axes of variation in synonymous codon usage compared to the other three methods.
  • WCA identified previously unrecognized sources of SCU variation in certain genomes, such as replication strand skew in Rickettsia prowazekii.
  • CA based on relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU), while widely used, was found to be less effective than WCA.

Conclusions:

  • WCA is the most effective CA method for analyzing synonymous codon usage variation in bacterial genomes.
  • WCA offers enhanced power to detect subtle SCU patterns and their underlying causes, including those related to genomic features like replication strand skew.