Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Novel and Innovative Hybrid Technique for Type A Aortic Dissection
Published on: March 28, 2025
Acute traumatic thoracic aortic injuries: experience with 64-MDCT
Scott D Steenburg1, James G Ravenel
1Department of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, PO Box 250322, 169 Ashley Ave., Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Objective:
At some institutions, catheter angiography is used for confirmation of aortic injuries and equivocal MDCT findings. Because of the speed and efficiency of 64-MDCT, we believe that diagnostic catheter angiography may be obsolete. The purpose of this study was to review our experience with 64-MDCT in the evaluation of acute traumatic aortic injury (ATAI).
Materials And Methods:
The trauma registry at a level 1 trauma center was reviewed to find cases of ATAI occurring between March 1, 2005, and July 31, 2007. MDCT images were correlated with transcatheter angiograms when obtained. Surgical and clinical reports were reviewed to confirm abnormal and normal findings and the stability of the conditions of patients undergoing conservative treatment.
Results:
After level 1 or level 2 trauma, 1,344 patients underwent contrast-enhanced 64-MDCT. Twenty-four patients (1.79%) were found to have 25 aortic injuries. All patients had direct MDCT signs of ATAI. Ten catheter angiograms were obtained after MDCT. The presence of direct signs was confirmed in three cases. In five cases, indirect signs were found to be normal findings. In two cases, the findings remained equivocal after MDCT and conventional angiography. Fourteen patients underwent surgical repair of the aorta, six underwent conservative management, and four patients died of other injuries. No patient with equivocal or indirect findings needed surgical repair. The sensitivity of 64-MDCT was 96.0%; specificity, 99.8%; positive predictive value, 92.3%; negative predictive value, 99.9%; and accuracy, 99.8%.
Conclusion:
Direct signs of ATAI on contrast-enhanced 64-MDCT scans do not have to be confirmed with catheter angiography. In our population, diagnostic transcatheter angiography was of limited value for clarifying equivocal or indirect MDCT findings.
Insights
Sixty-four-MDCT is a fast and efficient tool for diagnosing acute traumatic aortic injury (ATAI). Direct signs of ATAI on 64-MDCT scans do not require confirmation with catheter angiography, making it potentially obsolete.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Trauma Surgery
- Cardiovascular Imaging
Background:
- Catheter angiography is traditionally used to confirm aortic injuries.
- Advancements in 64-MDCT offer speed and efficiency in imaging.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the utility of 64-MDCT in diagnosing acute traumatic aortic injury (ATAI).
- To determine if catheter angiography is still necessary for equivocal MDCT findings.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of trauma registry data from March 2005 to July 2007.
- Correlation of 64-MDCT findings with transcatheter angiograms, surgical, and clinical reports.
- Analysis of diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 64-MDCT.
Main Results:
- 24 patients (1.79%) had 25 aortic injuries identified by 64-MDCT.
- 64-MDCT demonstrated high sensitivity (96.0%) and specificity (99.8%) for ATAI.
- Catheter angiography confirmed direct MDCT signs in only 3 cases and was equivocal in 2.
Conclusions:
- Direct signs of ATAI on 64-MDCT are reliable and do not require catheter angiography confirmation.
- Diagnostic transcatheter angiography has limited value for clarifying equivocal or indirect MDCT findings in ATAI.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Aneurysm I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
