Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Social Exchange Theory01:26

Social Exchange Theory

As formulated by John Thibaut and Harold Kelley, Social Exchange Theory explains human relationships as economic-like exchanges that maximize rewards and minimize costs. This theory suggests that individuals engage in relationships to gain benefits and reduce burdens, similar to economic transactions. It has been widely applied to various types of relationships, including romantic, professional, and social interactions.Rewards and Costs in RelationshipsRelationship rewards include emotional...
Social Exchange Theory02:06

Social Exchange Theory

We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
Sources of Self-Esteem III: Social Comparison01:27

Sources of Self-Esteem III: Social Comparison

Social comparison plays a fundamental role in the evaluation of personal success and self-worth. Rather than assessing our achievements in isolation, we interpret their significance relative to personal goals and critically in comparison to the performance of others. A grade of B in a mathematics exam might elicit pride if one's expectation was a C, yet result in disappointment if an A was anticipated or if peers achieved superior results. These comparative evaluations illustrate how both...
Equity Theory01:26

Equity Theory

Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...
Social Psychology and Individual Behavior01:29

Social Psychology and Individual Behavior

Social psychology examines how group dynamics, emotions, and cultural influences shape individual actions and decision-making. These elements interact to form behavioral patterns that affect personal choices and social interactions.The Role of Group DynamicsGroups play a crucial role in shaping behavior by reinforcing norms and expectations. Individuals derive a sense of self from group membership, often aligning their behaviors with group norms to maintain social cohesion. For example, an...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multi-focal ultrasound neuromodulation to the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex disrupts behavioural and neural pain processing.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Ultrasound neuromodulation reveals distinct roles of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and anterior insula in learning.

PLoS biology·2026
Same author

Investigating the analytical robustness of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026
Same author

Non-invasive ultrasonic neuromodulation of the human nucleus accumbens impacts reward sensitivity.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Non-invasive Ultrasonic Neuromodulation of the Human Nucleus Accumbens Impacts Reward Sensitivity.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Correction to: How visual and proprioceptive feedback mediate the effect of monetary incentive on motor precision.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025
Same journal

Thymidylate synthase inhibitory drugs induce p53-dependent pathways differently.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Top-down and bottom-up attention for joint pattern classification and reconstruction.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Short- and long-term scaling behavior of blood pressure and pulse arrival time during sleep in healthy controls and patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Double DQN-based secrecy energy efficiency and fairness performance in IRS-assisted NOMA systems with friendly jamming.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

10 recommendations for strengthening citizen science for improved societal and ecological outcomes: A co-produced analysis of challenges and opportunities in the 21st century.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Paying in public: Peer effects, impression management, and willingness to pay on digital payment platforms.

PloS one·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 28, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Interdependent utilities: how social ranking affects choice behavior.

Nadège Bault1, Giorgio Coricelli, Aldo Rustichini

  • 1Institut des Sciences Cognitives, Centre de Neuroscience Cognitive, CNRS UMR5229, Université Lyon1, Bron, France.

Plos One
|October 23, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Humans weigh social gains more heavily than losses, influencing risk-taking behavior. This contrasts with private decisions where losses loom larger, impacting social and economic choices.

More Related Videos

A Complex Diving-For-Food Task to Investigate Social Organization and Interactions in Rats
10:29

A Complex Diving-For-Food Task to Investigate Social Organization and Interactions in Rats

Published on: May 8, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 28, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

A Complex Diving-For-Food Task to Investigate Social Organization and Interactions in Rats
10:29

A Complex Diving-For-Food Task to Investigate Social Organization and Interactions in Rats

Published on: May 8, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Economics
  • Social Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Hierarchical social structures are common in animal societies, suggesting a biological basis for social ranking preferences in humans.
  • Social rank influences human behavior, affecting how individuals evaluate outcomes and make choices.
  • Understanding the interplay between social comparison and decision-making is crucial for economic and social behavior.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how social context influences the evaluation of gains and losses.
  • To examine the impact of social rank and competition on risk-taking behavior.
  • To develop a theoretical model explaining these observed behavioral patterns.

Main Methods:

  • Experimental design involving participants choosing between lotteries with varying risk levels.
  • Observation of participants' choices in both private and social domains, with social feedback provided.
  • Measurement of subjective emotional evaluations and physiological responses to assess outcome weighting.

Main Results:

  • In the private domain, losses had a greater subjective and physiological impact than gains.
  • In the social domain, gains were weighted more heavily than losses, as evidenced by emotional and physiological responses.
  • Social gains significantly influenced choice behavior, leading to more dominant and risk-seeking actions in competitive scenarios.

Conclusions:

  • Human decision-making exhibits domain-specific weighting of gains and losses, with social gains playing a critical role.
  • The interdependent utilities model explains how social comparison and rank-seeking motivate riskier, dominant behaviors.
  • Findings have implications for understanding social and economic behavior, particularly in competitive environments.