Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Splenectomy In Children: A Case Report with Literature Review
Published on: March 27, 2026
Management of high-grade splenic injury in children
Jeffrey Jim1, Michael J Leonardi, H Gill Cryer
1Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA.
Insights
In pediatric blunt splenic injuries, nearly half of children require surgery. While nonoperative management is often successful, 16% need delayed operations, highlighting the need for close monitoring.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Trauma Surgery
- Pediatric Critical Care
Background:
- High-grade blunt splenic injuries in children present significant management challenges.
- Splenic trauma management strategies include early operation and initial nonoperative management.
- Outcomes and predictors of failure in pediatric splenic trauma require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the outcomes of operative versus nonoperative management for high-grade blunt splenic injuries in children.
- To identify factors associated with the need for surgery and failure of nonoperative management.
- To compare mortality and hospital resource utilization between different management strategies.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of the National Trauma Databank (2001-2005).
- Inclusion criteria: children (<= 14 years) with high-grade blunt splenic injury (AIS > or = 4).
- Comparison of early operation (within 6 hours) versus initial nonoperative management (NOM).
Main Results:
- Overall mortality was 13.5%.
- Initial nonoperative management (NOM) was successful in 84% of patients.
- Operative intervention was necessary in 42% of cases, with 74% of these undergoing early operation (EOM).
- Early operation and failure of NOM were associated with lower blood pressure, lower Glasgow Coma Scale scores, higher Injury Severity Score, longer hospital stay, and higher mortality.
- Failure of NOM had similar mortality and length of stay compared to EOM.
Conclusions:
- Nearly half of pediatric patients with high-grade splenic injury require operative treatment.
- Nonoperative management is usually successful with careful patient selection and close monitoring.
- Delayed operation is required in 16% of cases initially managed nonoperatively, emphasizing the importance of vigilant observation.
Abstract:
Using the National Trauma Databank, we identified 413 children (age < or = 14 years) who sustained high-grade blunt splenic injury (Abbreviated Injury Scale scores > or = 4) from 2001 to 2005. Overall mortality was 13.5 per cent. Early operation within 6 hours of injury (EOM) was performed in 128 patients (31%). Patients not undergoing EOM (n = 285) were assumed to have been treated with initial nonoperative management (NOM). NOM was successful in 84 per cent of patients. Operative intervention was necessary in 42 per cent of cases with 74 per cent of these undergoing early operation (EOM). Total splenectomy was the most common procedure (83%). EOM and failure of NOM were both associated with lower systolic blood pressure and lower Glasgow Coma Scale score at admission, higher Injury Severity Score, longer hospital stay, and higher mortality. Need for surgery was independent of patient age and gender. Failure of NOM was associated with increased mortality compared with successful NOM, but had similar mortality and length of hospital or intensive care unit stay compared with EOM. We conclude that operative treatment is necessary in nearly half of pediatric patients with high-grade splenic injury. With careful selection, nonoperative management is usually successful but must include close monitoring, because 16 per cent required delayed operation.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol abuse, or...
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
