Beyond positivist ecology: toward an integrated ecological ethics.

Area of Science:

• Ecological science
• Environmental science
• Environmental ethics

Background:

• Traditional positivist science struggles to capture the complexity of environmental sciences.
• Ecological modeling requires integrating scientific values and processes.
• Existing environmental value theories (utilitarianism, intrinsic value) are insufficient for ecological sensitivity.

Purpose of the Study:

• To advocate for a post-positivist approach in ecological science.
• To introduce "reflexive ecological modeling" as a new framework.
• To explore the integration of values into ecological evaluation.

Main Methods:

• Analysis of "reflexive" ecological modeling approaches.
• Examination of the interaction between values and ecological models.
• Review of interdisciplinary theories of environmental value.

Main Results:

• Positivist science is inadequate for ecological evaluation.
• Reflexive modeling allows ecologists to examine their motives.
• Aldo Leopold's "think like a mountain" illustrates a shift in ecological modeling and values.
• Current value theories fail to provide a foundation for ecologically sensitive evaluation.

Conclusions:

• A new, interdisciplinary approach to ecological valuation is necessary.
• Evaluating metaphors in ecological models is crucial for a comprehensive approach.
• Integrating values through reflexive modeling enhances ecological sensitivity and public discourse.