Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Unrealistic Optimism Bias

Unrealistic Optimism Bias

Unrealistic optimism bias is the tendency to overestimate the likelihood of positive outcomes. This cognitive bias makes individuals believe they are less likely to experience failures, setbacks, or risks and more likely to succeed than others. For example, people may assume they are less prone to health issues, accidents, or financial struggles than their peers, even when they share similar risk factors.One key component of this bias is the above-average effect, where individuals perceive...

Social Exchange Theory

Social Exchange Theory

As formulated by John Thibaut and Harold Kelley, Social Exchange Theory explains human relationships as economic-like exchanges that maximize rewards and minimize costs. This theory suggests that individuals engage in relationships to gain benefits and reduce burdens, similar to economic transactions. It has been widely applied to various types of relationships, including romantic, professional, and social interactions.Rewards and Costs in RelationshipsRelationship rewards include emotional...

Social Exchange Theory

Social Exchange Theory

We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).

Equity Theory

Equity Theory

Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...

Social Traps

Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned more cows, the larger...

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Case study. Devotion or disease? Commentary.

The Hastings Center report·2011

Same author

Tales publicly allowed: competence, capacity, and religious belief.

The Hastings Center report·2007

Same author

The expressive meaning of enhancement.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2005

Same journal

Harm Reduction as an Alternative to Mandated Drug Treatment.

The Hastings Center report·2026

Same journal

Rethinking Mandated Drug Treatment: Why Expanding Freedom Requires Structural Drug Policy Reform.

The Hastings Center report·2026

Same journal

Banning Gender-Affirming Treatment for Minors: The Supreme Court Speaks.

The Hastings Center report·2026

Same journal

Making the Move to a Learning System of Research Ethics.

The Hastings Center report·2026

Same journal

Musical Performance and Biomedical Human Enhancement: Ethnographic Perspectives on Bioethical Questions.

The Hastings Center report·2026

Same journal

Transformed but Not Cured: The Ethics of Describing Gene-Editing Therapy for Sickle Cell Disease.

The Hastings Center report·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 28, 2026

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

Hope and exploitation.

Adrienne M Martin¹

¹University of Pennsylvania, Penn Center for Bioethics, USA.

The Hastings Center Report

|October 25, 2008

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Encouraging patient hope requires careful consideration to avoid exploitation. Medical professionals must recognize how hope influences patient decision-making, ensuring it enhances, rather than compromises, their deliberations.

More Related Videos

High-Throughput Optogenetics Experiments in Yeast Using the Automated Platform Lustro

High-Throughput Optogenetics Experiments in Yeast Using the Automated Platform Lustro

Published on: August 4, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 28, 2026

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

High-Throughput Optogenetics Experiments in Yeast Using the Automated Platform Lustro

High-Throughput Optogenetics Experiments in Yeast Using the Automated Platform Lustro

Published on: August 4, 2023

Area of Science:

Medical Ethics
Decision Science
Psychology of Hope

Background:

Patients' hope is a critical factor in medical decision-making.
The potential for exploitation of patient hope by medical researchers and pharmaceutical companies exists beyond overt misinformation.
Hope's influence on deliberation can be subtle yet significant.

Purpose of the Study:

To explore the ethical considerations of fostering hope in patients.
To analyze the mechanisms by which hope influences patient deliberation.
To identify strategies for encouraging hope without exploiting it.

Main Methods:

Conceptual analysis of ethical frameworks in medicine.
Review of psychological literature on hope and decision-making.
Case study analysis of patient-researcher interactions.

Main Results:

Hope can be exploited through subtle manipulation of expectations, not just false information.
Hope significantly impacts the quality and direction of a patient's deliberation process.
Ethical guidelines are needed to navigate the dual role of hope as both a therapeutic element and a potential vulnerability.

Conclusions:

Encouraging patient hope necessitates a nuanced ethical approach.
Understanding the impact of hope on deliberation is crucial for ethical medical practice.
Safeguarding against the exploitation of hope is paramount in patient care and research settings.