Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Refining the Definition for "Low Risk" in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Time to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality.

JACC. Heart failure·2026
Same author

Reply to Blette and Kawut: Surrogate Endpoints are Risky Business in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine·2026
Same author

szKendall: spatial-structural-zero-aware dissimilarity measures for subtype discovery using single cell Hi-C data.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Study of risk assessment scores as surrogate endpoints in pulmonary arterial hypertension trials.

American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine·2026
Same author

Addition of Ianalumab (VAY736) to Ibrutinib in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia on Ibrutinib Therapy: Results from a Phase Ib Study.

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research·2025
Same author

Can random walking on a Hi-C contact matrix lead to data quality improvement? An assessment.

PloS one·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Enhanced Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing for Assessment of DNA Methylation at Base Pair Resolution
13:47

Enhanced Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing for Assessment of DNA Methylation at Base Pair Resolution

Published on: February 24, 2015

Probe signal correction for differential methylation hybridization experiments.

Dustin P Potter1, Pearlly Yan, Tim H M Huang

  • 1Human Cancer Genetics Program, OSU Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. potterdp@gmail.com

BMC Bioinformatics
|October 25, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces two models to correct for non-biological noise in differential methylation hybridization (DMH) microarray data, focusing on probe sequence composition. These models help improve the accuracy of DMH analyses by addressing inherent experimental effects.

More Related Videos

DNA Methylation: Bisulphite Modification and Analysis
12:34

DNA Methylation: Bisulphite Modification and Analysis

Published on: October 21, 2011

Optimized Analysis of DNA Methylation and Gene Expression from Small, Anatomically-defined Areas of the Brain
13:11

Optimized Analysis of DNA Methylation and Gene Expression from Small, Anatomically-defined Areas of the Brain

Published on: July 12, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Enhanced Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing for Assessment of DNA Methylation at Base Pair Resolution
13:47

Enhanced Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing for Assessment of DNA Methylation at Base Pair Resolution

Published on: February 24, 2015

DNA Methylation: Bisulphite Modification and Analysis
12:34

DNA Methylation: Bisulphite Modification and Analysis

Published on: October 21, 2011

Optimized Analysis of DNA Methylation and Gene Expression from Small, Anatomically-defined Areas of the Brain
13:11

Optimized Analysis of DNA Methylation and Gene Expression from Small, Anatomically-defined Areas of the Brain

Published on: July 12, 2012

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • Non-biological signal, or noise, is a significant challenge in microarray analysis.
  • Differential Methylation Hybridization (DMH) experiments are susceptible to hybridization effects from probe-sequence composition and DNA dye-probe interactions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate models for correcting non-biologically relevant probe signal in DMH data.
  • To address the impact of probe-sequence composition on signal accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Proposed two statistical models to correct for noise.
  • Focused on probe-sequence composition as a source of non-biological signal.
  • Evaluated estimated effects and model strengths within DMH analyses.

Main Results:

  • The majority of estimated parameters across all models were statistically significant.
  • The developed models provide a means to correct for probe-sequence related noise.

Conclusions:

  • Model selection for signal correction in DMH should consider the interpretation and biological significance of estimated values.
  • The proposed models offer improved accuracy for DMH data analysis by accounting for inherent noise.