Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Radiographic pulpal calcifications: normal or abnormal--a paradox.

H S Selden1

  • 1Muhlenberg Hospital, Bethlehem, PA.

Journal of Endodontics
|January 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary

Radiographic pulpal calcifications (RPC) have a divided interpretation regarding pathological significance. However, endodontic specialists agree RPC are crucial for diagnosis and do not typically alter nonsurgical root canal treatment approaches.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The endo-antral syndrome.

Journal of endodontics·2016
Same author

Endodontic radiographs: realities and illusions.

General dentistry·2001
Same author

A suspected periradicular scar: treat or not?

Journal of endodontics·2001
Same author

Central giant cell granuloma: a troublesome lesion.

Journal of endodontics·2001
Same author

A successful nonsurgical treatment of an endodontic failure.

Journal of endodontics·2001
Same author

Diagnostic thermal pulp testing: a technique.

Journal of endodontics·2001

Area of Science:

  • Endodontics
  • Dental Radiology

Background:

  • Radiographic pulpal calcifications (RPC) are common findings in endodontic diagnosis.
  • Their clinical significance and impact on treatment decisions remain subjects of varied interpretation among specialists.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To survey Diplomates of the American Board of Endodontics regarding their interpretation of radiographic pulpal calcifications (RPC).
  • To ascertain the impact of RPC findings on endodontic treatment planning and execution.

Main Methods:

  • A survey was distributed to 525 domestic Diplomates of the American Board of Endodontics.
  • The survey included questions on the pathological significance and treatment implications of radiographic pulpal calcifications (RPC).

Main Results:

  • Responses regarding the pathological significance of RPC were equally divided between those who considered it a sign of pathosis and those who did not.
  • Overwhelming agreement was found on the importance of RPC in differential diagnosis.
  • Nonsurgical root canal treatment was routinely attempted irrespective of RPC extent.
  • Patients were consistently informed about potential treatment obstacles related to RPC.
  • Diplomates reported dedicating no more than 10% of their practice to surgical endodontics.

Conclusions:

  • Interpretation of the pathological significance of radiographic pulpal calcifications (RPC) varies among endodontic specialists.
  • Despite varied interpretations, RPC are considered important diagnostic findings that do not typically preclude or alter nonsurgical root canal treatment.
  • Patient communication regarding potential treatment challenges is standard practice.

Related Experiment Videos