[Can the scattering of differences from the target refraction be avoided?]

We wanted to check how the stochastic error is affected by two lens formulae.

The power of the intraocular lens was calculated using the SRK-II formula and the Haigis formula after eye length measurement with ultrasound and the IOL Master. Both lens formulae were partially derived and Gauss error analysis was used for examination of the propagated error.

61 patients with a mean age of 73.8 years were analysed. The postoperative refraction differed from the calculated refraction after ultrasound biometry using the SRK-II formula by 0.05 D (-1.56 to + 1.31, S. D.: 0.59 D; 92 % within +/- 1.0 D), after IOL Master biometry using the SRK-II formula by -0.15 D (-1.18 to + 1.25, S. D.: 0.52 D; 97 % within +/- 1.0 D), and after IOL Master biometry using the Haigis formula by -0.11 D (-1.14 to + 1.14, S. D.: 0.48 D; 95 % within +/- 1.0 D). The results did not differ from one another. The propagated error of the Haigis formula can be calculated according to DeltaP = square root (deltaL x (-4.206))(2) + (deltaVK x 0.9496)(2) + (DeltaDC x (-1.4950))(2). (DeltaL: error measuring axial length, DeltaVK error measuring anterior chamber depth, DeltaDC error measuring corneal power), the propagated error of the SRK-II formula according to DeltaP = square root (DeltaL x (-2.5))(2) + (DeltaDC x (-0.9))(2). The propagated error of the Haigis formula is always larger than the propagated error of the SRK-II formula.

Scattering of the postoperative difference from the expected refraction cannot be avoided completely. It is possible to limit the systematic error by developing complicated formulae like the Haigis formula. However, increasing the number of parameters which need to be measured increases the dispersion of the calculated postoperative refraction. A compromise has to be found, and therefore the SRK-II formula is not outdated.