Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026

08:49
External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?
Published on: June 6, 2020
Bipedalism and parturition: an evolutionary imperative for cesarean delivery?
Stuart Weiner1, Janet Monge, Alan Mann
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Imaging and Genetics, Maternal Fetal Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University and Hospital, 834 Chestnut Street, Suite 400, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA. sweinermd@comcast.net
Clinics in Perinatology
|October 28, 2008
Summary
Human evolution presents an obstetric dilemma, balancing bipedalism with larger brains. Universal cesarean delivery could alter human evolution, with unknown biologic and social consequences.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary biology
- Human evolution
- Paleoanthropology
Background:
- Human evolution involves a trade-off between adaptations for bipedalism and increasing brain size (encephalization).
- This evolutionary compromise created the
- obstetric dilemma
- a challenge impacting human birth success for millennia.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the evolutionary implications of modern medicine, specifically cesarean sections, on human reproductive success.
- To speculate on the potential future trajectory of human evolution if universal cesarean delivery becomes a norm.
Main Methods:
- This study is primarily theoretical and speculative, drawing on evolutionary biology principles.
- It analyzes the long-term consequences of alleviating natural selection pressures on childbirth.
Main Results:
- Modern medicine, through cesarean sections, has mitigated but not resolved the obstetric dilemma.
- The widespread adoption of cesarean delivery could represent a significant transition point in human evolution.
Conclusions:
- The future of human evolution may be significantly altered by the increasing reliance on cesarean sections.
- Potential social, biological, and demographic costs associated with universal cesarean delivery warrant further investigation.

