Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
Published on: June 11, 2012
Glycemic control in the ICU
Grant V Bochicchio1, Thomas M Scalea
1University of Maryland School of Medicine, Room T1R59, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. gbochicchio@umm.edu
Insights
Achieving tight glycemic control improves outcomes for critically ill patients. Continuous glucose monitoring may offer a solution to balance benefits and hypoglycemia risks in intensive care units.
Area of Science:
- Critical Care Medicine
- Endocrinology
- Medical Technology
Background:
- Glycemic control is crucial for improving outcomes in critically ill patients.
- Optimal glycemic targets and patient acuity levels for demonstrating clinical benefit remain unclear.
- Short ICU stays (≤3 days) may hinder the visualization of clinical benefits.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the optimal glycemic control range for critically ill patients.
- To determine if clinical benefits are specific to higher acuity patients.
- To identify methods for achieving target glycemic control without increasing hypoglycemia risk.
Main Methods:
- The study discusses the challenges in demonstrating clinical benefits in trials with short ICU stays.
- It posits that benefits are more evident in higher acuity patients with longer ICU stays related to inflammatory response reversal.
- The potential of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology is highlighted.
Main Results:
- Clinical benefits of glycemic control are more apparent in higher acuity patients.
- Achieving target glycemic control (80-110 mg/dL) without hypoglycemia is a significant challenge.
- Continuous glucose monitors offer a promising solution for precise and efficient glucose monitoring.
Conclusions:
- Glycemic control is vital for critically ill patients, particularly those with higher acuity.
- Continuous glucose monitoring devices are anticipated to facilitate safer and more effective glycemic management.
- Future advancements in technology may resolve current challenges in achieving optimal glycemic control.
Abstract:
Glycemic control clearly improves outcome in critically ill patients. Remaining questions are how tight the control must be to obtain the most benefit without increasing the risk for severe hypoglycemia, and whether an acuity level exists in which this benefit is not clearly visualized. In other words, is this benefit only seen in severely ill patients? The authors believe that clinical trials with ICU lengths of stay of 3 days or less make showing a clinical benefit difficult. Rather, they believe that clinical benefit is seen in higher acuity patients whose ICU length of stay is directly related to the reversal of the inflammatory systemic response rather than the disease or injury alone. Finally, the issue remains of how to obtain a TGC in the 80 to 110 mg/dL range without achieving a less-than-acceptable incidence of hypoglycemia. The answer may well lie with the introduction of continuous glucose monitors that will allow measurements to be obtained every 15 to 30 minutes without introducing an increased workload to the nursing staff. Many of these devices, such as the Optiscanner, which measures plasma glucose continuously, are on the horizon and should be approved by the FDA in 2008.
Related Concept Videos
Hypoglycemia and Glucagon
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...
Diabetic Ketoacidosis l: Introduction
Hyperglycemia
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: α-Glucosidase Inhibitors
Acarbose and miglitol are typically...
Insulin: Dosing Regimen and Adverse Effects
The basal dose constitutes about 40%-50% of the total daily dose, with the rest as premeal insulin. The mealtime insulin dose should mirror...