Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Proposal of a risk-stratification system for the Japanese population based on blood pressure levels: the Ohasama
Kei Asayama1, Takayoshi Ohkubo, Atsushi Sato
1Comprehensive Research and Education Center for Planning of Drug Development and Clinical Evaluation, Tohoku University 21st Century COE Program, Japan.
Insights
Home blood pressure (HBP) monitoring, unlike casual screening BP (CBP), significantly identifies elevated stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) risk, even in high-normal ranges. This highlights the importance of HBP for accurate risk stratification.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Epidemiology
- Hypertension Management
- Preventive Medicine
Background:
- Current hypertension guidelines rely on casual screening blood pressure (CBP), which may underestimate cardiovascular risk.
- Accurate risk stratification is crucial for preventing stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA).
- Home blood pressure (HBP) measurement offers a potential alternative for more precise BP assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a risk-stratification system using both home blood pressure (HBP) and casual screening blood pressure (CBP).
- To evaluate the predictive value of HBP and CBP for stroke and TIA incidence.
- To compare the risk stratification capabilities of HBP versus CBP based on Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines (JSH 2004).
Main Methods:
- A prospective cohort study involving 2,368 Ohasama residents aged ≥35 years without a history of stroke.
- Home blood pressure (HBP) was self-measured daily for 4 weeks; casual screening blood pressure (CBP) was measured twice at baseline.
- Follow-up for stroke or TIA incidence over a median of 9.4 years.
Main Results:
- Statistically significant linear increases in stroke/TIA risk were observed with both CBP-based and HBP-based classifications.
- High-normal blood pressure (BP) showed significantly elevated stroke/TIA risk with HBP (RH 1.91) but not with CBP (RH 1.52).
- Stroke/TIA risk increased linearly with increasing risk strata, irrespective of BP measurement type (trend p < 0.0001).
Conclusions:
- Home blood pressure (HBP) measurement is superior to casual screening blood pressure (CBP) in identifying individuals at high risk for stroke/TIA.
- The study proposes a novel risk-stratification system emphasizing the importance of HBP for accurate cardiovascular risk evaluation.
- Future Japanese BP guidelines should incorporate HBP assessment and consider risks for non-hypertensive individuals.
Abstract:
The aim of the present study was to propose a risk-stratification system based on self-measurement of home blood pressure (HBP) as well as casual-screening BP (CBP) in relation to Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension (JSH 2004). For 4 weeks, the subjects measured their HBP while seated every morning within 1 h after awaking, after having rested for at least 2 min. The subjects included 2,368 Ohasama residents aged > or = 35 years, with no history of stroke. CBP was measured twice consecutively at baseline. Among all subjects, there were 174 incidences of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) observed during 9.4 years (interquartile 7.0-12.4) of follow-up. The analysis revealed statistically significant linear increases in stroke or TIA risk in both the CBP-based and HBP-based classifications. The risk for high-normal blood pressure (BP) was not significantly high according to the CBP-based classification (relative hazard [RH] 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-2.60), whereas it was significantly high by the HBP-based classification (RH 1.91; 95% CI 1.04-3.51). On the basis of the data in the absolute risk table, the risks of first stroke or TIA for the 4 groups in the CBP-based and HBP-based classifications were proposed. Stroke or TIA risk increased linearly with the increase in the stage of stratified risk, regardless of BP information (trend p < 0.0001). Risks for non-hypertensive individuals should be assessed in the next version of the Japanese BP guidelines. Furthermore, the importance of HBP should be emphasized in order to accurately evaluate BP risks for individuals.
Related Concept Videos
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure:
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Factors affecting Blood pressure
Physiological Factors:
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Hypertension and Regulation of Blood Pressure