[Quantitative analysis of myocardial fibrosis in myocardial biopsies--a comparison between computer analysis and...

To select an appropriate method to analyze quantitatively myocardial fibrosis in myocardial biopsies, two methods, the computer analysis and the point-counting method observed at magnifications of x200 and x400, were compared. Our targeted points of examination were the accuracy and reproducibility of these methods. Twenty patients (10 with dilated cardiomyopathy and 10 with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy) were randomly selected, and the percent area of myocardial fibrosis in myocardial biopsies obtained from the right ventricular septum was measured by both the computer analysis and the point-counting method. Two observers measured the same area twice on the different days, independently. In the area of analysis, the endocardium was excluded to avoid the observer's bias. By comparing the data obtained from two observers, it was shown that the point-counting method tended to give a larger mean value and standard deviation than the computer analysis method, but that the latter indicated better reproducibility than the former. Our result showed that the degree of myocardial fibrosis varied according to methods of analysis and observer's experiences. It is recommended that the comparison of myocardial fibrosis should be made only when the methods of analysis of fibrosis are identical.