Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Quantification of Heavy Metals and Other Inorganic Contaminants on the Productivity of Microalgae
Published on: July 10, 2015
Development of methodologies to determine aluminum, cadmium, chromium and lead in drinking water by ET AAS using
Luciano de Almeida Pereira1, Ilmair Gonçalves de Amorim, José Bento Borba da Silva
1Departamento de Quimica, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Avenida Antônio Carlos 6627, 31270-901 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Abstract:
In this work, methodologies were developed to determine aluminum (Al), cadmium chromium and lead in drinking water by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry using permanent modifiers. No use of modifier, iridium, ruthenium, rhodium and zirconium (independently, 500mug) were tested to each one analyte through the pyrolysis and atomization temperatures curves. As the matrix is very simple, did not had occurred problems with the background for all metals. The best results obtained for cadmium and chromium was with the use of rhodium permanent modifier. For lead and aluminum, the best choice was the use of zirconium. The selection for the modifier took into account the sensitivity, form of the absorption pulse and low atomization temperature (what contributes to elevate the useful life of the graphite tube). For aluminum using zirconium permanent, the best pyrolysis and atomization temperatures were respectively, of 1000 and 2500 degrees C with a characteristic mass (1% of absorbance, m(o)) of 19 pg (recommended of 20 pg). For cadmium, with use of rhodium the best temperatures for the pyrolysis and atomization were respectively of 400 and 1100 degrees C, with a symmetrical peak and with a m(o) of 1.0 pg (recommended of 1.0 pg). For chromium with rhodium permanent, the best temperatures for pyrolysis and atomization were respectively of 1000 and 2200 degrees C, with symmetrical peak and m(o) of 5.3 pg (recommended of 5.5 pg). For lead with zirconium permanent, the best temperatures for pyrolysis and atomization were of 700 and 2400 degrees C, with symmetrical peak and with m(o) of 30 pg (recommended of 20 pg). Water samples spiked with each one of the metals in four different levels inside of the acceptable values presented recoveries always close to 100%. The detection limits were of 0.1mugl(-1) for cadmium; 0.2mugl(-1) for chromium; 0.5mugl(-1) for lead and 1.4mugl(-1) for aluminum.
Related Concept Videos
Effects of EDTA on End-Point Detection Methods
In the visual method, metal-ion indicators (metallochromic dyes), which have distinct colors in their free and complex forms, are added to the mixture to signal the titration's end point. They form stable complexes with metal ions, but these complexes are weaker than the corresponding metal–EDTA complexes. As a result, EDTA...
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Lab
Solutions containing organic solvents, such as low-molecular-mass alcohols, esters, or ketones, enhance absorbances by increasing nebulizer...
EDTA: Indirect and Alkalimetric Titration
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Overview
When irradiated by EMR of a particular wavelength, these...
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Radiation and Light Sources
Two common narrow-range 'line' sources used in AAS are hollow-cathode lamps (HCLs) and...
EDTA: Direct, Back-, and Displacement Titration
Direct titration involves buffering the metal ion solution to the desired pH and directly titrating with standard EDTA until the endpoint. The optimum pH ensures a large conditional formation constant of metal−EDTA and visibility of the free indicator color in the solution. In addition, auxiliary complexing reagents are used to prevent the precipitation of metal hydroxides and...

