Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026

09:32
Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion
Published on: April 11, 2018
Statistical modelling of knee valgus during a continuous jump test.
1Graduate School of Sports Science, Waseda University, Saitama, Japan. yasu-nagano@moegi.waseda.jp
Sports Biomechanics
|November 1, 2008
Summary
Two-dimensional (2D) knee valgus can moderately correlate with 3D knee abduction during jump landings, aiding anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury risk screening. However, 2D valgus analysis is not advised for evaluating internal tibial rotation.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Sports Medicine
- Orthopedics
Background:
- Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are a significant concern in athletes.
- Knee valgus during landing is a known risk factor for ACL injuries.
- Understanding the relationship between 2D and 3D knee kinematics is crucial for injury prevention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the correlation between two-dimensional (2D) knee valgus and three-dimensional (3D) knee kinematics during jump landings.
- To determine if 2D frontal plane analysis can accurately predict 3D knee motion related to ACL injury risk.
- To assess the utility of 2D knee valgus measurements for screening athletes.
Main Methods:
- Twenty-eight female collegiate athletes performed jump landing tasks.
- Three-dimensional (3D) knee abduction and internal tibial rotation were measured using the Point Cluster Technique.
- Two-dimensional (2D) peak knee valgus angle was assessed.
- Linear and non-linear regression analyses were employed to examine correlations.
Main Results:
- A moderate correlation was found between 2D knee valgus and 3D knee abduction (R2 significantly different from zero).
- No significant correlation was observed between 2D knee valgus and 3D internal tibial rotation (R2 not significantly different from zero).
- The 2D approach showed potential for screening specific aspects of landing mechanics.
Conclusions:
- Two-dimensional (2D) knee valgus measurements can offer a moderate correlation with 3D knee abduction during jump landings.
- Frontal plane 2D analysis of knee valgus is not a reliable method for assessing 3D internal tibial rotation.
- 2D analysis may serve as a screening tool for certain ACL injury risk factors, but not all.
Related Concept Videos
Knee Joint
The knee joint is the most complicated joint in the body. It consists of three articulations– two tibiofemoral and one patellofemoral. As is characteristic of synovial joints, the knee joint has a thin articular capsule that partially surrounds this joint cavity. Additionally, several ligaments, muscles, and cartilaginous structures support the movement of the knee.
A total of seven ligaments support the knee joint. The patellar ligament, which is also attached to the quadriceps femoris group...
A total of seven ligaments support the knee joint. The patellar ligament, which is also attached to the quadriceps femoris group...
Bones of the Lower Limb: Femur and Patella
The femur is the body's longest and strongest bone spanning the thigh region. Its head articulates with the acetabulum of the hip bone to form the hip joint. A minor indentation on the medial side of the femoral head, called the fovea capitis, serves as the site of attachment for the ligament of the head of the femur. This weak ligament spans the femur and acetabulum and supports the hip joint. The narrowed region below the head is the neck of the femur. The inclination angle between the neck...
Ankle Joint
The ankle is formed by the talocrural joint (crural = leg). It consists of the articulations between the talus bone of the foot and the distal ends of the tibia and fibula of the leg. The superior aspect of the talus bone is square-shaped and has three areas of articulation. The top of the talus articulates with the inferior tibia. This is the portion of the ankle joint that carries the body weight between the leg and foot. The sides of the talus are firmly held in position by the articulations...
Clearance Models: Noncompartmental Models
Clearance is a pharmacokinetic parameter traditionally defined by compartment models, signifying the rate at which a drug is expelled from the body. However, a noncompartmental model offers an alternative method for assessing clearance, primarily employing empirical data obtained after administering a single drug dose.
The noncompartmental approach capitalizes on extensive sampling data, correlating the volume of distribution to systemic exposure and the administered dosage. This method enables...
The noncompartmental approach capitalizes on extensive sampling data, correlating the volume of distribution to systemic exposure and the administered dosage. This method enables...

