Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Ethical Dilemmas II

Ethical Dilemmas II

Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching I: Assessment and Diagnosis

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching I: Assessment and Diagnosis

The nursing process provides a clinical decision-making framework for patients and families to establish and implement a personalized care plan. Since part of the nurse's duties is to teach patients, the steps of the nursing process are the most effective way to approach instruction. The nursing process and the teaching-learning process are inextricably linked.
It is critical to determine the patient's learning needs during the assessment. Determination of learning needs compounds data from the...

Standards of Care II

Standards of Care II

Nurses bear specific legal responsibilities under several federal statutes, including:

Decision Making: Traditional Method

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...

Critical Thinking II

Critical Thinking II

Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:

Decision Making

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Beyond futility: The history and potential of liver transplantation in cholangiocarcinoma.

World journal of transplantation·2025

Same author

Setting up an integrated service for PSC-IBD patients: A quality improvement project.

ILIVER..·2025

Same author

Ketamine cholangiopathy: clinical features and liver biopsy findings.

Histopathology·2025

Same author

Gender disparity in hepatobiliary endoscopy training and delivery: Results of a nationwide survey.

Endoscopy international open·2025

Same author

Discharging the duty of candor following delayed post-endoscopy cancer diagnosis.

Endoscopy international open·2024

Same author

Neurosurgical application of olaparib from a thermo-responsive paste potentiates DNA damage to prolong survival in malignant glioma.

British journal of cancer·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Achieving independence: a decision-making framework for doctors in training.

¹Royal Free Hospital, London. philaberry@hotmail.com

Clinical Medicine (London, England)

|November 4, 2008

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Junior doctors face critical decisions on independent practice during postgraduate training. A new framework helps them weigh patient safety and personal competence when deciding whether to proceed with treatment or seek senior support.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Medical Education
Clinical Decision-Making
Patient Safety

Background:

Postgraduate medical training requires junior doctors to make independent decisions regarding patient care.
These decisions often occur in high-stakes situations involving acutely unwell patients or complex procedures.
The ability to assess when to proceed independently versus seeking senior assistance is crucial for professional development.

Purpose of the Study:

To explore the key factors influencing junior doctors' decisions to practice independently or seek senior support.
To present a framework that aids junior doctors in evaluating the risks and benefits of their actions.
To enhance the decision-making process for junior doctors in critical care scenarios.

Main Methods:

Analysis of decision-making factors in postgraduate medical training.
Categorization of factors into patient-centered and physician-centered domains.
Exploration of these factors through two distinct clinical scenarios.

Main Results:

Identified patient-centered factors: patient autonomy and patient safety.
Identified physician-centered factors: self-assessed competence and personal comfort level.
Demonstrated the interplay of these factors in complex clinical situations.

Conclusions:

A structured approach is needed to guide junior doctors' decisions in independent practice.
Balancing patient needs with physician capabilities is essential for safe and effective medical care.
The proposed framework supports junior doctors in making informed choices, promoting both patient safety and professional growth.