Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Methods of Documentation V: CBE

Methods of Documentation V: CBE

Charting by Exception, or CBE, is a method of documentation used in healthcare, particularly in nursing, that focuses on documenting only significant or abnormal findings rather than recording every detail. This approach aims to streamline the documentation process, improve efficiency, and ensure that healthcare providers can quickly identify deviations from normalcy in patient assessments.
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...

Standards of Care II

Standards of Care II

Nurses bear specific legal responsibilities under several federal statutes, including:

Standards of Care I

Standards of Care I

Federal statutes profoundly impact nursing practice, providing critical guidelines to ensure patient care is equitable, accessible, and of the highest quality. The following laws address distinct aspects of healthcare provision and patient rights:

Critical Thinking II

Critical Thinking II

Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:

Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting

Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting

Focus Charting, also known as the focus charting system or "focus documentation," is a systematic documentation approach used in healthcare to organize patient information in medical records.
It typically involves three columns for recording information:

Ethical Issues

Ethical Issues

Nurses are essential in patient care, upholding the ethical principles of their profession and effectively navigating ethical dilemmas. Neglecting ethical issues can lead to inadequate patient care, compromised therapeutic relationships, and moral distress among healthcare workers.
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Does a diverse whole-food plant-based dietary intervention improve gut microbiome composition, gut symptoms, energy and hunger in healthy adults? A randomised controlled trial.

The British journal of nutrition·2026

Same author

Epidemiology of open and closed diastemata in equine cheek teeth and associations with periodontal pathology.

Veterinary research communications·2026

Same author

Connecting families-randomised controlled trial of poverty screening and financial support navigation for families of young children in primary care: an internal pilot study informed protocol.

BMJ open·2026

Same author

Health professionals' and leaders' views on routine using patient-centered outcome measures in a Chinese palliative care unit: A qualitative study.

Palliative & supportive care·2025

Same author

From Policy to Practice: A Qualitative Study on Reforms and Frontline Retention in Healthcare.

Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing·2025

Same author

Changing primary care capacity in Canada: protocol for a cross-provincial mixed methods study.

BMJ open·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Published on: April 29, 2014

Keeping a critical eye on chiropractic.

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics

|November 6, 2008

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Professional self-regulation and critical appraisal skills are vital for evaluating scientific information. This article provides red flags to help analyze data, research papers, and educational content effectively.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Published on: April 29, 2014

Area of Science:

Information Science
Scientific Communication
Professional Ethics

Background:

The proliferation of information necessitates robust methods for critical appraisal.
Professional self-regulation is crucial for maintaining scientific integrity.
Evaluating scientific articles and educational content requires specific analytical skills.

Discussion:

This article emphasizes the importance of professional self-regulation in the scientific community.
It highlights the need for critical appraisal of all forms of information, including scientific articles and educational materials.
A practical list of red flags is provided to aid in the analysis process.

Key Insights:

Critical appraisal skills are essential for navigating the complex information landscape.
Identifying potential biases or misinformation is key to reliable scientific understanding.
Self-regulation empowers professionals to uphold high standards in information analysis.

Outlook:

Continued development of critical appraisal tools will enhance scientific literacy.
Promoting professional self-regulation fosters a more trustworthy scientific environment.
Educating professionals on identifying information red flags is crucial for future research integrity.