Concurrent validity in Taiwan of the Comprehensive Developmental Inventory for Infants and Toddlers who were full-term infants
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing
Published on: February 7, 2025
Hua-Fang Liao1, Grace Yao, Tien-Miau Wang
1School and Graduate Institute of Physical Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, ROC.
Insights
The Comprehensive Developmental Inventory for Infants and Toddlers (CDIIT) shows acceptable concurrent validity with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-II (BSID-II) for motor and cognitive skills in infants. However, caution is advised when comparing Developmental Quotients between the two assessments.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Psychology
- Pediatric Assessment
Background:
- Accurate developmental assessment is crucial for early intervention in infants and toddlers.
- The Comprehensive Developmental Inventory for Infants and Toddlers (CDIIT) is a tool for assessing development.
- The Bayley Scales of Infant Development-II (BSID-II) is a widely used measure for infant development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the concurrent validity of the CDIIT against the BSID-II in full-term infants.
- To compare Developmental Ages and Developmental Quotients derived from both assessments.
Main Methods:
- 106 full-term infants (6-18 months) participated.
- One tester administered both the CDIIT and BSID-II.
- Pearson correlations and quadratic weighted kappa tests analyzed Developmental Ages and Quotients for motor and mental scales.
Main Results:
- High correlations were found for Developmental Ages between CDIIT and BSID-II (r = .91-.95) for cognitive and motor subtests.
- Moderate correlations were observed for Developmental Quotients (r = .57-.67).
- Moderate classification agreement (kappa = .50-.53) was noted, with CDIIT quotients tending to be slightly higher.
Conclusions:
- The CDIIT demonstrates acceptable concurrent validity with the BSID-II for motor and cognitive subtests.
- Clinicians and researchers should exercise caution when comparing Developmental Quotients from the CDIIT and BSID-II.
- Further research may be needed to understand discrepancies in Developmental Quotient classifications.
Abstract:
This study investigated the concurrent validity of the Comprehensive Developmental Inventory for Infants and Toddlers (CDIIT) with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-II (BSID-II) in full-term infants. 106 full-term infants ages 6 to 18 months (63 boys, 43 girls) were recruited as a convenience sample. One tester administered the CDIIT and BSID-II to all children. The Developmental Ages and Developmental Quotients of the motor and the mental scales from both tests were analyzed with Pearson correlations and quadratic weighted kappa tests. The results showed that correlation coefficients for Developmental Ages between both tests on cognitive and motor subtests were high (r = .91-.95) and for Developmental Quotients were moderate (r = .57-.67). Moderate classification agreement was found in the two scales (quadratic weighted kappa = .50-.53). Developmental Quotients classification for the CDIIT tended to be a little higher than for the BSID-II. It was concluded that although acceptable concurrent validity was found for the Motor and Cognitive subtests of the CDIIT, the tester should be cautious to compare Developmental Quotients obtained from the above two tests in clinical or in research settings.
Related Concept Videos
Three Developmental Domains
Physical Development
Physical processes, also known as maturation, encompass the biological changes that occur across an individual's life. These changes begin with genetic inheritance and continue through various stages, including growth in height and weight,...
Wechsler's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence
Reliability and Validity
Binet's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence

