Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.

Case Studies

Case Studies

There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.

Cross-Sectional Research

Cross-Sectional Research

In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...

Group Design

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

[Improving record linkage for health research-how to overcome deficiencies?]

Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz·2025

Same author

[Legal regulation of digital public health interventions-hindrance or stimulus?]

Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz·2024

Same author

[Data infrastructures for health research : Ethical framework and legal implementation].

Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz·2023

Same author

Medizinrecht : MedR·2021

Same author

Medizinrecht : MedR·2021

Same author

[Contact-Tracing Apps in Contact Tracing of COVID-19].

Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))·2020

Same journal

Comparative Legal Analysis of German and Austrian Constitutional Court Decisions on the Criminal Liability of Assisting Suicide.

European journal of health law·2026

Same journal

Addressing De Facto Discrimination through the European Health Data Space: Taking Obesity as a Case Study of Non-Immediate Primary Use.

European journal of health law·2026

Same journal

From Margins to Movement: Young Scholars, Digital Health, and the Future of EU Health Law.

European journal of health law·2026

Same journal

Conceptualising European Union Health Law.

European journal of health law·2026

Same journal

European Court of Human Rights.

European journal of health law·2026

Same journal

Balancing Care: Human Rights Perspectives on Family Caregivers in Long-Term Care.

European journal of health law·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Evaluation of the Storage Stability of Extracellular Vesicles

Evaluation of the Storage Stability of Extracellular Vesicles

Published on: May 22, 2019

Research with minors in Germany.

Benedikt Buchner¹, Dieter Hart

¹Institute for Health and Medical Law (IGMR), University of Bremen.

European Journal of Health Law

|November 8, 2008

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

German pharmaceutical law implements the European GCP Directive, creating specific rules for clinical trials involving minors. These regulations offer enhanced protection for participants, particularly in trials without direct individual benefit.

More Related Videos

Operating and Biocontainment Procedures of a Facility for Laboratory Mice with a Natural Microbiome: Immunophenotyping Procedure

Operating and Biocontainment Procedures of a Facility for Laboratory Mice with a Natural Microbiome: Immunophenotyping Procedure

Published on: December 13, 2024

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Evaluation of the Storage Stability of Extracellular Vesicles

Evaluation of the Storage Stability of Extracellular Vesicles

Published on: May 22, 2019

Operating and Biocontainment Procedures of a Facility for Laboratory Mice with a Natural Microbiome: Immunophenotyping Procedure

Operating and Biocontainment Procedures of a Facility for Laboratory Mice with a Natural Microbiome: Immunophenotyping Procedure

Published on: December 13, 2024

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Area of Science:

Pharmaceutical Law
Clinical Trials Ethics
Pediatric Research Regulations

Background:

The European Good Clinical Practice (GCP) Directive has been integrated into German law (sect. 40 ff. AMG).
German law establishes distinct categories for clinical trials involving minors, differing from the EU Directive.
Historical skepticism towards human research in Germany influenced the protective measures implemented.

Purpose of the Study:

To analyze the specific legal framework in Germany for conducting clinical trials on minors.
To highlight how German law enhances participant protection beyond the European GCP Directive.
To examine the regulatory distinctions for trials involving healthy minors, ill minors with individual benefit, and ill minors without direct benefit.

Main Methods:

Legal analysis of the German Pharmaceutical Law (AMG) concerning clinical trials on minors.
Comparative review of German regulations against the European GCP Directive.
Examination of specific provisions for different trial constellations involving pediatric participants.

Main Results:

German law categorizes trials on minors into three types: healthy, ill with individual benefit, and ill with group benefit.
The law permits trials on ill minors without direct individual benefit if a group benefit is anticipated.
Germany has opted to provide a higher level of protection for clinical trial subjects than mandated by the European level.

Conclusions:

German pharmaceutical law provides a nuanced and potentially more protective framework for clinical trials on minors.
The specific regulations reflect a cautious approach to pediatric research, influenced by historical context.
Legislative choices demonstrate Germany's commitment to robust ethical standards in human clinical research involving vulnerable populations.