Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

To circumcise or not.

H M Snyder1

  • 1University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia.

Hospital Practice (Office Ed.)
|January 15, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Neonatal circumcision is debated due to urinary tract infection risks in infants. This review separates facts from assumptions regarding intact foreskins, bacterial colonization, and potential kidney damage.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Editorial: The Future is Now: Advancing Blood-Based Markers.

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease·2022
Same author

Editorial: A Turning Point in Alzheimer's Research: Harmonized Research Strategies and Novel Investments in Public Health Infrastructure Are Reenergizing the Field, and Rekindling Hope for Those Affected by Alzheimer's and Related Dementias.

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease·2019
Same author

Alzheimer's Association: Initiatives and Public Health Perspective.

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease·2017
Same author

Indications for cholangiography.

The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association·2010
Same author

The present status of myelography as it pertains to the radiologist.

The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association·2010
Same author

Roentgen management of para-articular calcifications of the shoulder joint.

The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association·2010
Same journal

Oral contraceptives: an update.

Hospital practice (Office ed.)·1995
Same journal

Progress in the immunogenetics of rheumatoid arthritis.

Hospital practice (Office ed.)·1995
Same journal

An asymptomatic lung nodule in an elderly woman with joint pain.

Hospital practice (Office ed.)·1995
Same journal

Defusing status epilepticus.

Hospital practice (Office ed.)·1995
Same journal

Persistent fever and flank discomfort in a young woman.

Hospital practice (Office ed.)·1995
Same journal

New thoughts on attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Hospital practice (Office ed.)·1995
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Urology
  • Neonatal Health
  • Infectious Diseases

Background:

  • The link between urinary tract infections (UTIs) in infancy and neonatal circumcision has reignited the debate.
  • Proponents of circumcision cite potential bacterial colonization of the intact prepuce, leading to renal damage.
  • Opponents highlight the procedural risks and disadvantages.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the association between infant UTIs and neonatal circumcision.
  • To differentiate established facts from assumptions in the ongoing circumcision debate.
  • To provide an evidence-based perspective on the foreskin's role in infant urinary tract health.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing medical literature and epidemiological studies.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of data on UTI incidence in circumcised versus uncircumcised male infants.
  • Examination of the biological mechanisms of bacterial colonization and UTI development.

    • Main Results:

    • Evidence suggests a correlation between intact foreskins and increased UTI risk in infants.
    • The risk of renal damage from UTIs in uncircumcised infants requires careful consideration.
    • The debate involves complex factors beyond simple bacterial presence.

    Conclusions:

    • The decision regarding neonatal circumcision involves weighing potential UTI risks against procedural complications.
    • Further research is needed to fully elucidate the long-term implications of foreskin status on urinary tract health.
    • An objective assessment of scientific evidence is crucial for informed decision-making.