Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026

06:48
Automated Segmentation of Cortical Grey Matter from T1-Weighted MRI Images
Published on: January 7, 2019
Multiproject-multicenter evaluation of automatic brain tumor classification by magnetic resonance spectroscopy
Juan M García-Gómez1, Jan Luts, Margarida Julià-Sapé
1IBIME-Itaca, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Camino de Vera, Valencia, Spain. juanmig@upv.es
Magma (New York, N.Y.)
|November 8, 2008
Summary
Automatic brain tumor classification using magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is feasible with models trained on prior data. This approach aids in diagnosing new brain tumor cases and ensures quality control for multicenter MRS databases.
Area of Science:
- Neuroimaging
- Medical Diagnostics
- Machine Learning
Background:
- Automatic brain tumor classification using magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) has been explored for over a decade.
- Previous evaluations of predictive models have lacked testing on unseen cases from different centers.
- The multicenter eTUMOUR project provided a unique opportunity to evaluate predictive models on diverse, unseen data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of predictive models for brain tumor classification using MRS data acquired across different institutions.
- To assess the generalizability of classifiers developed from the INTERPRET project data when applied to the eTUMOUR dataset.
- To determine the feasibility of using previously developed classifiers for assisting in new brain tumor diagnoses.
Main Methods:
- 253 pairwise classifiers were developed for glioblastoma, meningioma, metastasis, and low-grade glial tumors.
- Classifiers were trained on 211 short TE INTERPRET magnetic resonance spectra (MRS) acquired at 1.5 T.
- The trained classifiers were tested on 97 subsequently acquired spectra from the eTUMOUR project.
Main Results:
- Accuracies around 90% were achieved for most pairwise tumor classifications using unseen spectra.
- Discrimination between glioblastoma and metastasis yielded lower accuracies (<78%).
- Alternative methods like MRSI + MRI might offer clearer metastasis definition.
Conclusions:
- In-vivo MRS tumor type prediction is possible with classifiers trained on data from different hospitals and instrumentation, provided consistent acquisition protocols.
- This methodology can assist in diagnosing new brain tumor cases.
- The approach is valuable for quality control of multicenter MRS databases.