Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis01:10

Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis

The nurse documents nursing diagnoses and enters them into the patient record. The identified patient's nursing diagnosis is either written out with a plan of care or entered into the electronic health record.
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters assessment...
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Long-term outcomes and late effects of surgery and radiotherapy in adult intracranial ependymoma patients.

Journal of neuro-oncology·2026
Same author

Evaluation of robust central nervous system treatment planning on a compact, gantry-less proton therapy system.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same author

Safety and antitumour activity of ipatasertib combined with endocrine therapy and a CDK4/6 inhibitor in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (TAKTIC): a single-centre, open-label, phase 1b trial.

The Lancet. Oncology·2026
Same author

AI-based detection of coronary artery calcium score in non-gated chest computed tomography of patients who decline statin therapy: A missed opportunity for prevention.

Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography·2026
Same author

Cumulative excess weight exposure over time and cardiovascular risk: A prospective cohort study.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Pattern of Failure Analysis and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Grade 2 Meningiomas Following Radiation Therapy.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2025
Same journal

Sensitivity Analyses of a Scoring System for a Contraception Decision Aid.

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium·2026
Same journal

Improving electronic health record processing of large language models via retrieval-augmented generation: A case study on dietary supplements.

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium·2026
Same journal

Developing a User-Centered Mobile Application Prototype: Bridging Lower-Limb Fracture Care from Skilled Nursing Facility and Back to the Community.

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium·2026
Same journal

KERAP: A Knowledge-Enhanced Reasoning Approach for Accurate Zero-shot Diagnosis Prediction Using Multi-agent LLMs.

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium·2026
Same journal

Automating Adjudication of Cardiovascular Events Using Large Language Models.

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium·2026
Same journal

Predictive Factors and State-Level Barriers to Postpartum Birth Control Usage in the United States: Insights from PRAMS Phase 8.

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Databases to Efficiently Manage Medium Sized, Low Velocity, Multidimensional Data in Tissue Engineering
09:43

Databases to Efficiently Manage Medium Sized, Low Velocity, Multidimensional Data in Tissue Engineering

Published on: November 22, 2019

Analysis of data errors in clinical research databases.

Saveli I Goldberg1, Andrzej Niemierko, Alexander Turchin

  • 1Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

AMIA ... Annual Symposium Proceedings. AMIA Symposium
|November 13, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Clinical research data errors are frequent and varied, impacting study results. Current detection methods underestimate total errors, necessitating improved strategies for data integrity in research.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Databases to Efficiently Manage Medium Sized, Low Velocity, Multidimensional Data in Tissue Engineering
09:43

Databases to Efficiently Manage Medium Sized, Low Velocity, Multidimensional Data in Tissue Engineering

Published on: November 22, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Research
  • Data Management
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Data entry errors in clinical research databases are prevalent.
  • Limited understanding exists regarding the characteristics and optimal strategies for detecting and preventing these errors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the frequency, distribution, and features of data entry errors in clinical research databases.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of current error detection and prevention methods.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of data from multiple clinical research databases at an academic medical center.
  • Utilized the double-entry method for error rate detection.
  • Assessed error detection based on data constraint failure.

Main Results:

  • Error rates varied significantly, ranging from 2.3% to 26.9% using the double-entry method.
  • Errors stemmed from both data entry mistakes and misinterpretation of source documents.
  • Constraint-based error detection underestimated total error rates, and integrated alarms prevented only a small fraction of errors.
  • A significant portion of errors were non-random, exhibiting spatial and cognitive clustering, with potential impact on study interpretation.

Conclusions:

  • Data errors in clinical research are common, complex, and can affect study outcomes.
  • Existing error detection and prevention strategies are insufficient.
  • Further research is required to develop more effective methods for identifying and mitigating data errors in clinical research.