Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures from...

Null and Alternative Hypotheses

Null and Alternative Hypotheses

The actual hypothesis testing begins by considering two hypotheses. They are termed the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. These hypotheses contain opposing viewpoints.
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the population that is...

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...

Binomial Probability Distribution

Binomial Probability Distribution

A binomial distribution is a probability distribution for a procedure with a fixed number of trials, where each trial can have only two outcomes.
The outcomes of a binomial experiment fit a binomial probability distribution. A statistical experiment can be classified as a binomial experiment if the following conditions are met:
There are a fixed number of trials. Think of trials as repetitions of an experiment. The letter n denotes the number of trials.
There are only two possible outcomes,...

McNemar's Test

McNemar's Test

McNemar's Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there is a significant difference in proportions between two related groups when the outcome is binary (e.g., yes/no, success/failure). It is beneficial when we have paired data, such as pre-test/post-test designs, where the same subjects are measured under two different conditions. The test is named after the statistician Quinn McNemar, who introduced it in 1947. It is commonly used in situations where subjects are...

Types of Hypothesis Testing

Types of Hypothesis Testing

There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p ≠ 0.5.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Surgical management of spinal multiple myeloma: insights from the National Inpatient Sample database.

Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)·2024

Same author

Milestones for neurosurgery sub-interns: a novel evaluation tool to quantitatively differentiate residency applicants.

Journal of neurosurgery·2023

Same author

National trends in the surgical management of metastatic lung cancer to the spine using the national inpatient sample database from 2005 to 2014.

Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia·2021

Same author

Current trends in incidence, characteristics, and surgical management of metastatic breast cancer to the spine: A National Inpatient Sample analysis from 2005 to 2014.

Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia·2021

Same author

Factors associated with length of stay after single-level posterior thoracolumbar instrumented fusion primarily for degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Surgical neurology international·2021

Same author

Changes in the Operative Corridor in Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Between Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Intraoperative Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Using Morphometric Analysis.

Cureus·2020

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

A multinomial-dirichlet model for analysis of competing hypotheses.

Kristin A Duncan¹, Jonathan L Wilson

¹Department of Mathematics and Statistics, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA 92182, USA. duncan@sciences.sdsu.edu

Risk Analysis : an Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis

|November 13, 2008

Summary

This study introduces a Bayesian approach to analyzing competing hypotheses, offering a robust method for evaluating evidence and quantifying uncertainty in hypothesis probabilities. The model enhances decision-making across various fields like intelligence analysis and psychology.

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Area of Science:

Decision Analysis
Bayesian Statistics
Cognitive Science

Background:

Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) is a vital method for evaluating explanations across disciplines.
Existing ACH methods lack robust quantitative uncertainty measures.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop a Bayesian extension of the Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) methodology.
To provide quantitative measures of uncertainty for hypothesis probabilities.

Main Methods:

Formulated as a multinomial-Dirichlet hierarchical model.
Treated hypotheses as multinomial random variables.
Evidence evaluation structured as prior distribution elicitation.

Main Results:

The Bayesian model yields measures of uncertainty for hypothesis probabilities.
Inference includes point/interval estimates, probability ratios, and Bayes factors.
Illustrative example using San Diego Chargers' stadium relocation.

Conclusions:

The proposed Bayesian ACH framework offers a statistically rigorous method for hypothesis evaluation.
Extensions handle complex evidence types like irrelevant, contradictory, or deceptive information.
Enhances decision-making under uncertainty in fields such as intelligence and psychology.