Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Toward understanding response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: left ventricular dyssynchrony is only one of
Chirine Parsai1, Bart Bijnens, George Ross Sutherland
1Department of Cardiology, St George's Hospital, Blackshaw Road, SW17 0QT London, UK. chirineparsai@hotmail.com
Insights
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response depends on multiple factors, not just left ventricular dyssynchrony. Identifying and correcting these correctable mechanisms improves patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Current echocardiographic methods primarily assess left ventricular dyssynchrony (LV DYS) as a sole predictor for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response.
- This study challenges that notion, hypothesizing that multiple correctable factors dictate CRT efficacy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether multiple independent mechanisms, beyond LV DYS, predict response to CRT.
- To identify specific pathological mechanisms influencing CRT outcomes.
Main Methods:
- 161 patients undergoing CRT were evaluated pre- and post-therapy using echocardiography.
- Response was defined by NYHA Class reduction or LV reverse remodeling.
- Four distinct pathological mechanisms were identified and analyzed for their impact on CRT response.
Main Results:
- Left ventricular dyssynchrony with septal flash (LV DYS-SF) was observed in 54% of patients, with 100% reverse remodeling upon SF elimination.
- Other identified mechanisms included short-AV delay (13%), long-AV delay (10%), and exaggerated LV-RV interaction (9%), each showing varying degrees of response.
- 14% of patients had none of these correctable mechanisms and did not respond to CRT.
Conclusions:
- CRT response is multifactorial, with LV DYS being only one component.
- Echocardiographic assessments focusing solely on long-axis DYS measurements underestimate treatment response by failing to identify up to 40% of responders.
Aim:
To date, most published echocardiographic methods have assessed left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony (DYS) alone as a predictor for response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We hypothesized that the response is instead dictated by multiple correctable factors.
Methods And Results:
A total of 161 patients (66 +/- 10 years, EF 24 +/- 6%, QRS > 120 ms) were investigated pre- and post-CRT (median of 6 months). Reduction in NYHA Class >/=1 or LV reverse remodelling (end-systolic volume reduction >/= 10%) defined response. Four different pathological mechanisms were identified. Group1: LVDYS characterized by a pre-ejection septal flash (SF) (87 patients, 54%). Elimination of SF (77 of 87 patients) resulted in reverse remodelling in 100%. Group 2: short-AV delay (21 patients, 13%) resolution (19 of 21 patients) resulted in reverse remodelling in 16 of 19. Group 3: long-AV delay (16 patients, 10%) resolution (14 of 16 patients) resulted in NYHA Class reduction >/=1 in 11 with reverse remodelling in five patients. Group 4: exaggerated LV-RV interaction (15 patients, 9%) reduced post-CRT. All responded clinically with fall in pulmonary artery pressure (P = 0.003) but did not volume respond. Group 5: patients with none of the above correctable mechanisms (22 patients, 14%). None responded to CRT.
Conclusion:
CRT response is dictated by correction of multiple independent mechanisms of which LVDYS is only one. Long-axis DYS measurements alone failed to detect 40% of responders.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanism of Cardiac Arrhythmias
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care

