Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Selection01:46

Types of Selection

37.5K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
37.5K
Frequency-dependent Selection01:21

Frequency-dependent Selection

20.1K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
20.1K
Predator-Prey Interactions02:39

Predator-Prey Interactions

17.2K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
17.2K
Conservation of Small Populations02:04

Conservation of Small Populations

14.4K
Small population sizes put a species at extreme risk of extinction due to a lack of variation, and a consequent decrease in adaptability. This weakens the chances of survival under pressures such as climate change, competition from other species, or new diseases. Large populations are more likely to survive pressures such as these, as such populations are more likely to harbor individuals that have genetic variants that are adaptive under new stresses. Small populations are much less...
14.4K
The Evidence for Evolution02:55

The Evidence for Evolution

40.1K
Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.
40.1K
Convergent Evolution01:54

Convergent Evolution

27.6K
Evolution shapes the features of organisms over time, ensuring that they are suited for the environments in which they live. Sometimes, selection pressure leads to the rise of similar but unrelated adaptations in organisms with no recent common ancestors, a process known as convergent evolution.
27.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Musculo-skeletal variation in the forelimb of two highly specialised diggers (genus Talpa).

Journal of anatomy·2026
Same author

From head to tail: does habitat use drive morphological variation in snakes?

Journal of evolutionary biology·2026
Same author

Thermal and immunological stress modulate the locomotor performance of female <i>Xenopus laevis</i> frogs.

Conservation physiology·2026
Same author

Endocranial morphology in worm lizards (Amphisbaenia, Squamata): multiple neuroanatomical solutions to a fossorial lifestyle.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Anatomical description of the jaw muscles and theoretical bite force assessment in South American opossums using manual and digital dissection methods.

Journal of anatomy·2026
Same author

The Impact of Substrate Properties on the Kinematics of Locomotion in a Limb-Reduced Skink, Ablepharus kitaibelii (Squamata: Scincidae).

Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological and integrative physiology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 3, 2026

Dissection and Flat-mounting of the Threespine Stickleback Branchial Skeleton
08:02

Dissection and Flat-mounting of the Threespine Stickleback Branchial Skeleton

Published on: May 7, 2016

9.4K

Is extreme bite performance associated with extreme morphologies in sharks?

Daniel R Huber1, Julien M Claes, Jérôme Mallefet

  • 1Department of Biology, University of Tampa, 401 West Kennedy Boulevard, Box U, Tampa, Florida 33606, USA. dhuber@ut.edu

Physiological and Biochemical Zoology : PBZ
|November 14, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Large sharks do not bite harder than expected for their size, but head width is a key predictor of bite force. Tooth shape and diet also influence bite force, with hard-prey specialists having pointed teeth.

More Related Videos

Assaying Predatory Feeding Behaviors in Pristionchus and Other Nematodes
06:27

Assaying Predatory Feeding Behaviors in Pristionchus and Other Nematodes

Published on: September 4, 2016

10.7K
Behavioral Tracking and Neuromast Imaging of Mexican Cavefish
14:58

Behavioral Tracking and Neuromast Imaging of Mexican Cavefish

Published on: April 6, 2019

7.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 3, 2026

Dissection and Flat-mounting of the Threespine Stickleback Branchial Skeleton
08:02

Dissection and Flat-mounting of the Threespine Stickleback Branchial Skeleton

Published on: May 7, 2016

9.4K
Assaying Predatory Feeding Behaviors in Pristionchus and Other Nematodes
06:27

Assaying Predatory Feeding Behaviors in Pristionchus and Other Nematodes

Published on: September 4, 2016

10.7K
Behavioral Tracking and Neuromast Imaging of Mexican Cavefish
14:58

Behavioral Tracking and Neuromast Imaging of Mexican Cavefish

Published on: April 6, 2019

7.2K

Area of Science:

  • Marine biology
  • Biomechanics
  • Evolutionary biology

Background:

  • Sharks are apex predators with powerful bites, but bite force has been difficult to test.
  • It's unclear if shark bite force relates to body size or diet-driven adaptations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate the relationship between body size, head morphology, tooth shape, and bite force in sharks.
  • Determine factors influencing bite force capacity in different shark species.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis across multiple shark species.
  • Multiple regression modeling to identify predictors of bite force.
  • Examination of head width and tooth morphology in relation to diet.

Main Results:

  • Large sharks do not exhibit exceptionally high bite forces relative to their body size.
  • Head width is the strongest predictor of bite force across species.
  • Sharks with high relative bite force have more pointed anterior teeth.
  • Species consuming hard prey show high bite forces and narrow, pointed jaw symphysis teeth.

Conclusions:

  • Shark bite force is influenced by head width and tooth morphology, not solely body size.
  • Dietary adaptations, particularly for hard prey, correlate with specific dental and bite force characteristics.
  • Head width and tooth shape are key adaptations related to feeding ecology in sharks.