Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Protein Target Prediction and Validation of Small Molecule Compound
Published on: February 23, 2024
Lead finder: an approach to improve accuracy of protein-ligand docking, binding energy estimation, and virtual
Oleg V Stroganov1, Fedor N Novikov, Viktor S Stroylov
1MolTech Ltd., Leninskie gory, 1/75A, Moscow 119992, Russian Federation, andBioMolTech Corp., 226 York Mills Road, Toronto, Ontario M2L 1L1, Canada.
Abstract:
An innovative molecular docking algorithm and three specialized high accuracy scoring functions are introduced in the Lead Finder docking software. Lead Finder's algorithm for ligand docking combines the classical genetic algorithm with various local optimization procedures and resourceful exploitation of the knowledge generated during docking process. Lead Finder's scoring functions are based on a molecular mechanics functional which explicitly accounts for different types of energy contributions scaled with empiric coefficients to produce three scoring functions tailored for (a) accurate binding energy predictions; (b) correct energy-ranking of docked ligand poses; and (c) correct rank-ordering of active and inactive compounds in virtual screening experiments. The predicted values of the free energy of protein-ligand binding were benchmarked against a set of experimentally measured binding energies for 330 diverse protein-ligand complexes yielding rmsd of 1.50 kcal/mol. The accuracy of ligand docking was assessed on a set of 407 structures, which included almost all published test sets of the following programs: FlexX, Glide SP, Glide XP, Gold, LigandFit, MolDock, and Surflex. rmsd of 2 A or less was observed for 80-96% of the structures in the test sets (80.0% on the Glide XP and FlexX test sets, 96.0% on the Surflex and MolDock test sets). The ability of Lead Finder to distinguish between active and inactive compounds during virtual screening experiments was benchmarked against 34 therapeutically relevant protein targets. Impressive enrichment factors were obtained for almost all of the targets with the average area under receiver operator curve being equal to 0.92.
More Related Videos
08:49Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
Published on: June 20, 2025
14:34A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English
Published on: April 3, 2026
Related Concept Videos
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength
Protein-protein Interfaces
Ligand Binding and Linkage