Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Withholding and withdrawing life support.

T A Raffin1

  • 1Stanford University Center for Biomedical Ethics.

Hospital Practice (Office Ed.)
|March 15, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Physicians face difficult decisions when healing is impossible. Applying biomedical ethics principles like beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice guides life support choices for patient and family benefit.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ethical consideration of incidental findings on adult brain MRI in research.

Neurology·2004
Same author

Pharmacogenomics and the challenge to privacy.

The pharmacogenomics journal·2002
Same author

PG490-88, a derivative of triptolide, blocks bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis.

The American journal of pathology·2001
Same author

Conflict over communication and unprofessional staff behavior: a common source of dissatisfaction during the withdrawal of care?

Critical care medicine·2001
Same author

The impact of practice setting on physician perceptions of the quality of practice and patient care in the managed care era.

Archives of internal medicine·2001
Same author

Biomedical ethics and the withdrawal of advanced life support.

Annual review of medicine·2001
Same journal

Oral contraceptives: an update.

Hospital practice (Office ed.)·1995
Same journal

Progress in the immunogenetics of rheumatoid arthritis.

Hospital practice (Office ed.)·1995
Same journal

An asymptomatic lung nodule in an elderly woman with joint pain.

Hospital practice (Office ed.)·1995
Same journal

Defusing status epilepticus.

Hospital practice (Office ed.)·1995
Same journal

Persistent fever and flank discomfort in a young woman.

Hospital practice (Office ed.)·1995
Same journal

New thoughts on attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Hospital practice (Office ed.)·1995
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Bioethics
  • Clinical Decision-Making

Background:

  • Physicians often encounter situations where restoring health or relieving suffering is not possible.
  • Life support decisions present complex ethical and practical challenges for all involved parties.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the role of fundamental biomedical ethics principles in guiding life support decisions.
  • To examine how these principles can benefit patients, families, and medical staff.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of core biomedical ethics principles: beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice.
  • Analysis of relevant legal precedents.
  • Examination of clinical applications of these ethical guidelines.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The application of biomedical ethics principles provides a framework for navigating complex end-of-life care scenarios.
  • Adherence to these principles can lead to improved outcomes and reduced distress for patients and their families.
  • Ethical guidelines support medical staff in making difficult decisions.

Conclusions:

  • Biomedical ethics principles are essential for sound clinical judgment in situations of non-restorable health.
  • A structured ethical approach benefits all stakeholders involved in life support decisions.
  • Integrating legal and ethical considerations enhances patient care at the end of life.