Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Errors in Global Positioning System01:26

Errors in Global Positioning System

Global Positioning System (GPS) technology has revolutionized navigation and positioning, but its accuracy is often compromised by various errors. These errors, stemming from environmental, satellite, and receiver-related factors, require careful mitigation to ensure reliable performance across applications.Atmospheric ErrorsGPS signals travel through the Earth’s ionosphere and troposphere, introducing delays which affect accuracy. The ionosphere is strongly influenced by charged particles,...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impaired Spatial Inhibition Processes for Interhemispheric Anti-saccades following Dorsal Posterior Parietal Lesions.

Cerebral cortex communications·2021
Same author

Sensory Prediction of Limb Movement Is Critical for Automatic Online Control.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2020
Same author

Do prism and other adaptation paradigms really measure the same processes?

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2019
Same author

Saccadic Adaptation Boosts Ongoing Gamma Activity in a Subsequent Visuoattentional Task.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2018
Same author

Paradoxical adaptation of successful movements: The crucial role of internal error signals.

Consciousness and cognition·2018
Same author

Reachability judgement in optic ataxia: Effect of peripheral vision on hand and target perception in depth.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2017

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior
09:49

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

Two modes of error processing in reaching.

Frederic Magescas1, Christian Urquizar, Claude Prablanc

  • 1Espace et Action, INSERM, U864, Bron, France.

Experimental Brain Research
|November 18, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Motor adaptation for purposeful actions is independent of automatic online corrections. Continuous feedback prevents adaptation, while delayed feedback enables robust motor learning, suggesting distinct neural pathways for error correction and adaptation.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Motor Control
  • Human Movement Science

Background:

  • Motor responses can be corrected online via voluntary or automatic control.
  • Persistent errors lead to iterative improvement through motor adaptation.
  • Reaching adaptation is often linked to sensory prediction errors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare two hand-reaching paradigms with undistorted sensory feedback.
  • To investigate the relationship between online correction and motor adaptation.
  • To determine if adaptation relies on inter-sensory mismatch.

Main Methods:

  • Two innovative hand-reaching paradigms were employed.
  • Experiment 1: Continuous visual feedback allowed automatic online corrections.
  • Experiment 2: Visual feedback was eliminated during movement, providing error information only at movement's end.

More Related Videos

An Emerging Target Paradigm to Evoke Fast Visuomotor Responses on Human Upper Limb Muscles
09:27

An Emerging Target Paradigm to Evoke Fast Visuomotor Responses on Human Upper Limb Muscles

Published on: August 25, 2020

Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans
10:51

Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans

Published on: January 15, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior
09:49

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

An Emerging Target Paradigm to Evoke Fast Visuomotor Responses on Human Upper Limb Muscles
09:27

An Emerging Target Paradigm to Evoke Fast Visuomotor Responses on Human Upper Limb Muscles

Published on: August 25, 2020

Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans
10:51

Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans

Published on: January 15, 2018

Main Results:

  • Experiment 1 showed no adaptation despite online correction of motor planning errors.
  • Experiment 2 demonstrated robust and generalized adaptation with the same motor planning error.
  • Adaptation occurred without limb inter-sensory mismatch, and was independent of automatic online correction.

Conclusions:

  • Motor adaptation and automatic online correction are independent processes.
  • Adaptation can occur without sensory prediction errors or cognitive interference.
  • A visuomotor cerebro-cerebellar network is proposed to explain these findings.