Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Group Design02:01

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...
Random Error01:04

Random Error

Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Two-Way ANOVA01:17

Two-Way ANOVA

The two-way ANOVA is an extension of the one-way ANOVA. It is a statistical test performed on three or more samples categorized by two factors - a row factor and a column factor. Ronald Fischer mentioned it in 1925 in his book 'Statistical Methods for Researchers.'
The two-way ANOVA analysis initially begins by stating the null hypothesis that there is an interaction effect between the two factors of a dataset. This effect can be visualized using line segments formed by joining the means for...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Associations of endocrine disrupting chemicals with anogenital distance across infancy.

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism·2026
Same author

Kin Keeper<sup>SM</sup> Breast and Cervical Cancer Prevention: An Educational Intervention: A Community-Based Randomized Controlled Trial in Black, Latina, and Arab Women.

Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education·2026
Same author

High pesticide exposure events and subjective cognitive complaints among US farmers.

Environmental research·2026
Same author

Olfaction and Coronary Heart Disease.

JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery·2025
Same author

Impacts of the 2021 child tax credit advance monthly payments on birth outcomes in the United States: a natural experiment.

American journal of epidemiology·2025
Same author

Poor olfaction and risk of heart failure in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.

The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences·2025
Same journal

Checking Genetic Homogeneity Between Two Samples Using Summary Statistics With Application to Mendelian Randomization.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Bayesian Learning Model for Joint Risk Prediction of Alcohol and Cannabis Use Disorders.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Reluctant Transfer Learning in Penalized Regressions for Individualized Treatment Rules Under Effect Heterogeneity.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Predictor-Assisted Nonparametric Graphical Models With Multivariate Error-Prone Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Optimizing Treatment Decision Estimation for Right-Censored Survival Data Through Parameter Transfer Learning.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Latent Class Log-Linear Models for Estimating Diagnostic Test Accuracy Without a Gold Standard: A Simulation Study.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

Fixed effects, random effects and GEE: what are the differences?

Joseph C Gardiner1, Zhehui Luo, Lee Anne Roman

  • 1Division of Biostatistics, Department of Epidemiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA. jgardiner@epi.msu.edu

Statistics in Medicine
|November 18, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study compares statistical models for longitudinal data, including random effects, fixed effects, and generalized estimating equations. Understanding their assumptions is key for appropriate application in research, such as analyzing depressive symptoms in pregnant women.

More Related Videos

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Longitudinal Data Analysis
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Longitudinal repeated-measures data analysis requires careful selection of statistical methods.
  • Common approaches include random effects models, fixed effects models, and generalized estimating equations.
  • Widespread software availability has increased the application of these models across disciplines.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the underlying assumptions of different statistical models for longitudinal data.
  • To compare the application and potential empirical differences of these models.
  • To guide the appropriate selection of statistical methods based on research questions.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of statistical models: random effects, fixed effects, and generalized estimating equations.
  • Examination of assumptions related to covariate effects on continuous, dichotomous, or count outcomes.
  • Illustration using a case study of depressive symptoms in low-income pregnant women with repeated assessments.

Main Results:

  • The study highlights the critical assumptions underpinning each statistical approach.
  • Empirical results may show similarities, but conceptual differences necessitate careful model selection.
  • The choice of model depends on the specific research questions and data collection design.

Conclusions:

  • Understanding the conceptual distinctions between statistical models is crucial for their correct application.
  • Proper application ensures accurate assessment of covariate effects in longitudinal studies.
  • The selection of an appropriate statistical model is guided by the research objectives and study design.