Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026

An Ex vivo Assay to Study Candida albicans Hyphal Morphogenesis in the Gastrointestinal Tract
Published on: July 1, 2020
Critical overview of clinical guidelines relating to invasive fungal infections
Márcio Borges Sá1, Rafael Zaragoza
1Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Son Llàtzer, Carretera de Manacor, Palma de Mallorca, Spain. mborges@hsll.es
Abstract:
The incidence of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) has continued to grow in recent years. IFIs are associated with significant morbidity and mortality as well as costs. The diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to IFI have changed significantly in recent years, fostered by the introduction of new diagnostic methods and new antifungal products. There are also new therapeutic approaches such as de-escalation, pre-emptive antifungal treatment or combined treatment with antifungals. All of these aspects have been described in many trials, meta-analyses and reviews. There are also different clinical guidelines for IFIs with diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations. They are of unquestionable value and at the same time represent different perspectives on the problem. The lack of homogeneity when selecting and drafting the recommendations is a problem, and some of them are based more on personal opinion than on evidence. In this paper, we have put together a critical overview of the role of guidelines for IFIs, with emphasis on non-neutropenic critical patients.
Insights
Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are increasing, necessitating updated guidelines. This review critically examines current IFIs guidelines, focusing on non-neutropenic critical patients.
Area of Science:
- Medical Mycology
- Infectious Diseases
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- Rising incidence of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) contributes to significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs.
- Recent advancements in diagnostics and antifungal therapies are reshaping IFI management.
- Existing clinical guidelines for IFIs offer valuable recommendations but exhibit heterogeneity and potential bias.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide a critical overview of the role and limitations of current guidelines for managing invasive fungal infections.
- To emphasize the specific challenges and considerations for IFIs in non-neutropenic critical patients.
Main Methods:
- Critical review of existing literature on invasive fungal infections.
- Analysis of current clinical guidelines for IFI diagnosis and treatment.
- Focus on evidence-based recommendations versus expert opinion.
Main Results:
- The landscape of IFI diagnosis and treatment is rapidly evolving with new tools and therapies.
- Heterogeneity in guideline development and recommendations may stem from varying evidence interpretation and expert opinions.
- A critical appraisal of guidelines is essential for optimizing IFI care, particularly in complex patient populations.
Conclusions:
- Current guidelines for invasive fungal infections require critical evaluation due to variability in their development and recommendations.
- Further research and consensus are needed to standardize IFI management, especially for non-neutropenic critical patients.
- A nuanced approach to guideline application is crucial for effective IFI treatment in critical care settings.
Related Concept Videos
Cryptococcal Meningitis
Antifungal Agents
Candidiasis
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin create...
Overview of Fungi
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
