Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026
08:13
Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
Published on: May 10, 2019
Implications for social policy of variability in racial groups
1Department of Counselling, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA. helmsja@bc.edu
The American Psychologist
|November 19, 2008
Summary
Single cut scores on cognitive tests may unfairly advantage White individuals and disadvantage Black individuals. Alternative decision-making methods, like ratio comparisons, could offer fairer outcomes in high-stakes assessments.
Area of Science:
- Psychometrics
- Social Policy
- Educational Assessment
Background:
- Legislation mandates single cut scores for high-stakes decisions using cognitive ability, knowledge, or skills (CAKS) tests.
- Cut scores are favored for objectivity and fairness over subjective criteria.
- Threats to statistical conclusion validity, like group variability differences, are often overlooked.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the fairness of single cut scores on CAKS tests across racial groups.
- To explore alternative decision-making approaches for high-stakes assessments.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 40 Black and White samples.
- Examination of differential impacts of common cut scores.
- Comparison of cut score decisions with ratio-based decisions.
Main Results:
- Identified potential significant advantages for White individuals and disadvantages for Black individuals with common cut scores.
- Demonstrated that ratio-based decisions can be fairer than CAKS test cut scores, depending on score placement.
Conclusions:
- Single cut scores on CAKS tests may not be equitable across racial groups due to differing variability.
- Social policy and assessment practices should consider these disparities and explore fairer alternatives for high-stakes decisions.
Related Concept Videos
02:55Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who are...
01:19Impact of Groups on Groups
Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
01:11Variability: Analysis
Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
01:31In- and Out-Groups
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
01:28Impact of Groups on Individuals
Groups play a fundamental role in shaping individual behavior, as they establish norms that guide interactions and decision-making. Social psychology examines how individuals conform to group expectations, often adjusting their attitudes and actions to align with group norms. These norms can be formal, such as workplace policies, or informal, such as unspoken social expectations within a fraternity.Conformity and Social InfluenceConformity arises when individuals modify their behaviors or...
01:09Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift
In a population that is not at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequency of alleles changes over time. Therefore, any deviations from the five conditions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium can alter the genetic variation of a given population. Conditions that change the genetic variability of a population include mutations, natural selection, non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift (small population size).Mechanisms of Genetic VariationThe original sources of genetic variation are mutations,...