Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Rigor in feminist research.

J M Hall1, P E Stevens

  • 1School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco.

ANS. Advances in Nursing Science
|March 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study defines scientific adequacy in feminist research, proposing new rigor standards for nurse investigators. It critiques traditional empiricist criteria, offering better concepts for evaluating feminist studies.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Coarse-grained force fields via rotational entropy corrections to free-energy landscapes of diffusing molecules.

Physical review. E·2025
Same author

Generalized Einstein Relation for Markovian Friction Coefficients from Molecular Trajectories.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

The <sup>40</sup>Ar(d,p)<sup>41</sup>Ar cross section between 3-7 MeV.

Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine·2022
Same author

Epidemic Dysentery.

Atlanta medical and surgical journal·2022
Same author

Reply to Verougstraete et al. Comment on HbA<sub>1c</sub> determination from HemaSpot blood collection devices: comparison of home-prepared dried blood spots with standard venous blood analysis.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2020
Same author

Biological variation of cardiac troponins in chronic kidney disease.

Annals of clinical biochemistry·2020
Same journal

Asian American and Pacific Islander Nurses: A Professional Force That Deserves Full Recognition.

ANS. Advances in nursing science·2026
Same journal

Effectiveness of Auricular Acupressure in Improving Sleep Quality and Reducing Insomnia Severity in Middle-Aged and Older Women in Taiwan.

ANS. Advances in nursing science·2026
Same journal

Work-Related Factors, Sleep Problems, and Metabolic Syndrome among Taiwanese Workers: Sex-Specific Implications for Occupational Health Nursing.

ANS. Advances in nursing science·2026
Same journal

Reclaiming Nursing's Professional Identity in the Era of Artificial Intelligence.

ANS. Advances in nursing science·2026
Same journal

Indigenous Women's Experiences With Perinatal Nursing Care: Beyond Deficit Narratives to Work Toward Sovereign Wellbeing.

ANS. Advances in nursing science·2026
Same journal

Knowledge, Attitude, Practice, and Motivation for Compliance With Infection Prevention and Control Procedures Among Undergraduate Nursing Students in Taiwan.

ANS. Advances in nursing science·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Nursing Research
  • Feminist Theory
  • Research Methodology

Background:

  • Ensuring the scientific rigor of feminist studies is crucial for credible research.
  • Feminist inquiry requires specific standards to validate its processes and outcomes.
  • Traditional research criteria may not fully capture the nuances of feminist scholarship.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define scientific adequacy within the context of feminist research.
  • To propose new standards of rigor applicable to nursing studies with a feminist perspective.
  • To critique and move beyond conventional empiricist measures of reliability and validity.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the concept of scientific adequacy in feminist inquiry.
  • Critique of traditional empiricist criteria (reliability, validity).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of alternative concepts for evaluating feminist research.

    • Main Results:

    • A framework for understanding scientific adequacy in feminist studies is presented.
    • Critique of conventional empiricist criteria highlights their limitations for feminist research.
    • New concepts are offered to better represent the dimensions of adequacy in feminist inquiry.

    Conclusions:

    • Feminist research necessitates distinct standards for scientific adequacy.
    • Nurse investigators can utilize these proposed standards to enhance study rigor.
    • Moving beyond empiricist criteria allows for a more comprehensive evaluation of feminist scholarship.