Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Ultrasound Images of the Tongue: A Tutorial for Assessment and Remediation of Speech Sound Errors
Published on: January 3, 2017
Frequency and spectrum of errors in final radiology reports generated with automatic speech recognition technology
Leslie E Quint1, Douglas J Quint, James D Myles
1Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan MI 48109-0030, USA. lequint@umich.edu
A significant number of radiology reports contain dictation errors, with over 20% having potentially confusing mistakes. Most radiologists underestimate the frequency of these speech recognition errors in their reports.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Medical Informatics
- Speech Recognition Technology
Background:
- Automatic speech recognition (ASR) technology is widely used in healthcare, particularly for generating radiology reports.
- ASR systems frequently produce transcription errors, necessitating thorough proofreading and editing to ensure report accuracy.
- Understanding the types and frequency of dictation errors is crucial for improving the quality of finalized radiology reports.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the frequency of significant dictation errors in radiology reports generated using ASR technology.
- To identify the specific types and spectrum of these dictation errors.
- To compare radiologists' perceptions of error rates with actual findings.
Main Methods:
- A review of 265 radiology reports prepared for multidisciplinary thoracic oncology conferences.
- Comparison of each report with its corresponding imaging study to identify significant dictation errors.
- A survey of departmental radiologists to gather their estimates of overall and individual report error rates.
Main Results:
- 78% of reports had no significant errors, while 22% contained errors.
- The most common errors included wrong-word substitution, nonsensical phrases, and missing words.
- A majority of radiologists surveyed underestimated the actual error rates, with most believing their own error rates were below 10%.
Conclusions:
- Over 20% of finalized radiology reports contained potentially confusing dictation errors.
- There is a significant discrepancy between perceived and actual error rates among radiologists.
- Increased awareness of error frequency and types is essential for developing strategies to enhance report accuracy and patient safety.
Related Concept Videos
Errors and Mistakes in Surveying
Errors in Taping
Random and Systematic Errors
Random and Systematic Errors
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Random Error
