Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Law of Effect01:06

Law of Effect

B.F. Skinner, a prominent figure in behavioral psychology, introduced operant conditioning by emphasizing the role of consequences in shaping behavior. This theory builds upon the law of effect proposed by Edward Thorndike, which posits that behaviors followed by satisfying outcomes are likely to be repeated. In contrast, those followed by unsatisfying outcomes are less likely to recur.
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle boxes...
Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation01:18

Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation

Incentive theory, or the "pull theory" of motivation, suggests that external rewards primarily drive behavior. Individuals are motivated to engage in activities when they anticipate a desirable outcome. This is why people often work hard for promotions or study intensively to achieve high grades. These incentives can be tangible, physical rewards such as money or promotions, or intangible, non-physical rewards like praise and social recognition.
The theory differentiates between intrinsic and...
Equity Theory01:26

Equity Theory

Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...
Optimal Arousal Theory01:23

Optimal Arousal Theory

The optimal arousal theory suggests that performance is maximized when an individual experiences a moderate level of arousal. This theory is closely tied to the Yerkes-Dodson law, which illustrates an inverted U-shaped relationship between arousal and performance. The law, formulated by psychologists Robert Yerkes and John Dodson, implies an ideal arousal level for optimal performance, and deviations from this level can lead to declines in effectiveness.
Inverted U-Shaped Performance Curve
The...
Compensation Mechanisms01:28

Compensation Mechanisms

The human body employs intricate mechanisms to counteract changes in blood pH, preventing conditions like acidosis (pH < 7.35) and alkalosis (pH > 7.45). These compensatory responses aim to restore normal arterial blood pH by engaging respiratory or renal systems, depending on the source of the imbalance.
Respiratory Compensation
This mechanism addresses metabolic-induced pH imbalances by adjusting breathing rates. Respiratory compensation begins within minutes of detecting a pH...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A single reinforcement learning model to unify habit formation and Pavlovian-instrumental interaction.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Pre-stimulus brain states predict and control variability in stimulation responses.

Brain stimulation·2026
Same author

Transient boosting of action potential backpropagation for few-shot temporal pattern learning.

PLoS computational biology·2025
Same author

Building on models-a perspective for computational neuroscience.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2025
Same author

Dorsomedial striatum monitors unreliability of current action policy and probes alternative one via the indirect pathway.

Science advances·2025
Same author

A State-Transition-Free Delayed-Feedback Task Elicits Heterogeneous Human Responses.

Journal of cognition·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans
12:09

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans

Published on: March 19, 2014

When does reward maximization lead to matching law?

Yutaka Sakai1, Tomoki Fukai

  • 1Brain Science Institute, Tamagawa University, Machida, Tokyo, Japan.

Plos One
|November 26, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Maximizing reward in decision-making can lead to matching behavior when past choices are ignored. This matching strategy, when combined with exploring state variables, offers a novel way to maximize rewards.

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral economics
  • Animal decision-making
  • Reinforcement learning

Background:

  • The fundamental strategy animals use in decision-making, whether maximizing rewards or matching them, remains debated.
  • Understanding these strategies is crucial for comprehending animal behavior and cognitive processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between maximizing and matching strategies in animal decision-making.
  • To demonstrate how a matching strategy can be beneficial for reward maximization.

Main Methods:

  • Mathematical modeling of decision-making algorithms.
  • Analysis of stationary conditions for reward maximization.
  • Simulation of strategy application with state variable exploration.

More Related Videos

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
06:11

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

Published on: February 20, 2019

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans
12:09

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans

Published on: March 19, 2014

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
06:11

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

Published on: February 20, 2019

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Main Results:

  • Algorithms aiming for stationary reward maximization inherently lead to matching behavior if past choices are disregarded.
  • The proposed 'matching strategy' offers an effective approach to reward maximization.
  • Combining the matching strategy with exploration of relevant state variables enhances reward maximization.

Conclusions:

  • The study reveals a novel insight into how matching behavior can be a beneficial component of reward maximization.
  • This work bridges the theoretical gap between maximizing and matching strategies in behavioral science.