Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026

A Training Program Using an Agility Ladder for Community-Dwelling Older Adults
Published on: March 7, 2020
Healthy lifestyles through an Adaptive Living Program: a pilot study.
Meghan Barnes1, Kim Bigari, Tiffany Culler
1Crystal M. Lange College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Saginaw Valley State University, University Center, Michigan 48710, USA. mlbarne1@svsu.edu
The Adaptive Living Program (ALP) did not significantly improve objective health measures for low-income adults. However, participants reported enhanced quality of life and social skills post-program.
Area of Science:
- Occupational Therapy
- Community Health
- Adult Education
Background:
- Low-income adults in subsidized housing often face challenges impacting quality of life.
- Adaptive Living Programs (ALPs) aim to improve life satisfaction and social functioning.
- Evaluating the efficacy of community-based interventions is crucial for public health.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the impact of a 12-week Adaptive Living Program (ALP) on quality of life and life satisfaction.
- To examine changes in physical, social, and emotional health variables among participants.
- To explore participants' subjective experiences and perceived benefits of the program.
Main Methods:
- A 12-week Adaptive Living Program (ALP) involving 12 modules and 3 community outings.
- 19 low-income adults participated in bi-weekly 1.5-hour sessions.
- Data collected via RAND SF-36 and a non-standardized qualitative tool, including a focus group.
Main Results:
- Quantitative analysis of RAND SF-36 scores showed no significant differences in physical, social, or emotional health.
- Qualitative data from focus groups indicated participants perceived improvements in social skills, nutrition knowledge, and interpersonal skills.
- Participants reported increased quality of life and life satisfaction.
Conclusions:
- While objective health measures did not significantly change, the Adaptive Living Program (ALP) yielded perceived benefits in social and interpersonal domains.
- Methodological limitations, including small sample size and non-standardized tools, necessitate cautious interpretation of findings.
- Recommendations for future research include larger, diverse samples, standardized assessments, and extended program duration.
More Related Videos
11:21Methodology for Establishing a Community-Wide Life Laboratory for Capturing Unobtrusive and Continuous Remote Activity and Health Data
Published on: July 27, 2018
08:48Adapted Resistance Training Improves Strength in Eight Weeks in Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis
Published on: January 29, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Lifestyle Factors and Health
Benefits of Physical Activity
Physical activity, whether through structured exercise or casual activities like walking, biking, or dancing, is a cornerstone of a...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results from...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I
The health belief model (HBM) attempts to predict health-related behavior in specific belief patterns. According to the HBM, a person's...
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...
Longitudinal Research