Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026

In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis
Published on: May 4, 2017
Comparing apples to apples: policymakers take a shine to comparative effectiveness research
Joanne Kaldy1, Claudia Schlosberg
1Hagerstown, Maryland, USA.
Abstract:
Comparative effectiveness research is gaining attention as a potential means to standardize quality, improve outcomes, and control medication costs. By implementing such research programs and establishing clearinghouses for comparative effectiveness data, government officials, policymakers, payers, researchers, and others hope that practitioners and consumers alike will use this information to make informed decisions about medications and other aspects of care. Pharmacists will have a role in the comparative effectiveness movement, particularly regarding their pharmacologic expertise and their skills as educators.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Bioequivalence: Overview
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

