Driving forces behind increasing cardiovascular drug utilization: a dynamic pharmacoepidemiological model

Helle Wallach Kildemoes1, Henrik Støvring, Morten Andersen

  • 1Research Unit for General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. hwkildemoes@health.sdu.dk

Insights

Cardiovascular drug use increased significantly due to higher incidence, not population aging. This trend is expected to continue, indicating a pharmacoepidemiological imbalance.

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacoepidemiology
  • Cardiovascular medicine
  • Public health

Background:

  • Cardiovascular drug utilization has been increasing.
  • Understanding the drivers of this trend is crucial for healthcare planning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the primary factors contributing to the rising use of cardiovascular drugs.
  • To differentiate the impact of population aging versus changes in treatment dynamics.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized Danish register data from 1996-2006, tracking cardiovascular drug dispensing.
  • Employed a semi-Markov model to analyze treatment incidence, discontinuation, and mortality.
  • Assessed the influence of population aging using standardized intensities and prevalences.

Main Results:

  • Cardiovascular drug treatment prevalence (ages >=20) rose by 39% (1996-2005), with intensity increasing by 109%.
  • Increasing treatment incidence was the main driver, followed by declining discontinuation; population aging had a smaller impact.
  • Treatment prevalence continued to increase even when incidence was held constant in models.

Conclusions:

  • Rising cardiovascular drug use is driven by increased treatment incidence and prevalence, not solely population aging.
  • Pharmacoepidemiological disequilibrium suggests continued growth in treatment prevalence.
  • Interventions targeting incidence and discontinuation may be necessary to manage utilization trends.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Pharmacodynamic Models: Additive and Proportional Drug Effect Model01:09

Pharmacodynamic Models: Additive and Proportional Drug Effect Model

Drug response models describe how pharmacological agents interact with biological systems to produce measurable effects. Baseline responses are inherent physiological activities without a drug significantly influencing the observed pharmacological outcomes. Depending on the drug response model employed, these baseline responses may combine with the drug's effect in either an additive or proportional manner.Additive Drug Response ModelIn the additive model, the drug effect is independent of the...
Pharmacodynamic Models: Emax Drug–Concentration Effect Model01:18

Pharmacodynamic Models: Emax Drug–Concentration Effect Model

The Emax drug-concentration effect model is central to pharmacodynamics in drug discovery and development. This model is predicated on the receptor occupancy theory, which posits that the effect of a drug is directly related to the number of receptors occupied by the drug and the resultant complex formation.The model describes the reversible interaction between a drug (C) and a receptor (R) to form a drug-receptor complex (RC). The kinetics of this interaction are quantified by an equation that...
Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model01:29

Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model

Pharmacodynamic models are essential tools in understanding the relationship between drug concentrations and their effects on biological systems. By characterizing the dynamics of drug action, these models guide dose selection, optimize therapeutic efficacy, and inform the development of new drugs. Two major classes of pharmacodynamic models include direct effect and indirect response models.Direct Effect ModelsDirect effect models describe the immediate relationship between drug concentration...
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions01:15

Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions

PK–PD modeling has significantly influenced FDA regulatory decisions, particularly drug approval, dosage optimization, and labeling. These models integrate pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) to predict drug behavior and effects, aiding in optimizing dosing regimens and enhancing the probability of clinical trial success.One notable example is Nesiritide (Natrecor®), a recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide for treating acute decompensated congestive heart failure (CHF).
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Problems01:24

Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Problems

The empirical approach to drug therapy optimization relies on correlating pharmacological response with administered dosage. Such an approach can be costly, time-consuming, and often yields poor correlation due to variables like formulation factors and drug elimination characteristics. A more precise approach correlates response with plasma drug concentration or the amount of drug in the body, rather than dosage. This is achieved through pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling, which...
Pharmacodynamic Models: Overview01:27

Pharmacodynamic Models: Overview

Pharmacodynamic (PD) responses describe the interaction between a drug and its biological target, culminating in a physiological effect. These responses can be classified into different types: continuous variables, such as blood glucose levels; categorical outcomes, like survival rates; and time-to-event metrics, such as disease progression. Understanding and modeling PD responses are critical for optimizing drug efficacy and safety.PD models describe the relationship between drug concentration...