Typical aromatic noncovalent interactions in proteins: A theoretical study using phenylalanine
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Computational Prediction of Amino Acid Preferences of Potentially Multispecific Peptide-Binding Domains Involved in Protein-Protein Interactions
Published on: January 26, 2024
Cherumuttathu H Suresh1, Neetha Mohan, K Periya Vijayalakshmi
1Computational Modeling and Simulation Section, National Institute for Interdisciplinary Science and Technology, Trivandrum. sureshch@gmail.com
Abstract:
A systematic study of CH...pi, OH...pi, NH...pi, and cation...pi interactions has been done using complexes of phenylalanine in its cationic, anionic, neutral, and zwitterionic forms with CH(4), H(2)O, NH(3), and NH(4) (+) at B3LYP, MP2, MPWB1K, and M06-2X levels of theory. All noncovalent interactions are identified by the presence of bond critical points (bcps) of electron density (rho(r)) and the values of rho(r) showed linear relationship to the binding energies (E(total)). The estimated E(total) from supermolecule, fragmentation, and rho(r) approaches suggest that cation...pi interactions are in the range of 36 to 46 kcal/mol, whereas OH...pi, and NH...pi interactions have comparable strengths of 6 to 27 kcal/mol and CH...pi interactions are the weakest (0.62-2.55 kcal/mol). Among different forms of phenylalanine, cationic form generally showed the highest noncovalent interactions at all levels of theory. Cooperativity of multiple interactions is analyzed on the basis of rho(r) at bcps which suggests that OH...pi and NH...pi interactions show positive, whereas CH...pi and cation...pi interactions exhibit negative cooperativity with respect to the side chain hydrogen bond interactions. In general, side chain interactions are strengthened as a result of aromatic interaction. Solvation has no significant effect on the overall geometry of the complex though slight weakening of noncovalent interactions by 1-2 kcal/mol is observed. An assessment of the four levels of theory studied herein suggests that both MPWB1K and M06-2X give better performance for noncovalent interactions. The results also support the fact that B3LYP is inadequate for the study of weak interactions.
More Related Videos
05:44Insights into the Interactions of Amino Acids and Peptides with Inorganic Materials Using Single-Molecule Force Spectroscopy
Published on: March 6, 2017
12:07Chemical Modification of the Tryptophan Residue in a Recombinant Ca2+-ATPase N-domain for Studying Tryptophan-ANS FRET
Published on: October 9, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...
Protein Folding
Protein Structure Is Critical to Its Biological Function
Proteins perform a wide range of biological functions such as catalyzing chemical reactions, providing...
Protein Folding
Basicity of Aromatic Amines
Protein-protein Interfaces