Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Randomized trial of cardiac resynchronization in mildly symptomatic heart failure patients and in asymptomatic
Cecilia Linde1, William T Abraham2, Michael R Gold3
1Department of Cardiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Insights
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) significantly improves heart structure and function, reducing hospitalizations for heart failure (HF) in patients with NYHA class I/II symptoms. This therapy offers a vital option for managing HF progression.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is established for advanced heart failure (NYHA class III/IV).
- Previous studies show CRT improves left ventricular (LV) function and outcomes in severe heart failure.
- The benefit of CRT in earlier stages of heart failure (NYHA class I/II) requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of CRT in patients with NYHA functional class II and class I (ACC/AHA stage C) heart failure.
- To assess the impact of CRT on clinical composite response, LV remodeling, and HF hospitalizations.
- To determine if CRT provides benefits in patients with less advanced heart failure symptoms.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial involving 610 patients with NYHA class I/II heart failure and prolonged QRS (> or =120 ms).
- Patients received CRT devices and were assigned to active CRT (CRT-ON) or control (CRT-OFF) for 12 months.
- Primary endpoint: HF clinical composite response; Secondary endpoints: LV end-systolic volume index and HF hospitalization rates.
Main Results:
- While the primary composite endpoint did not reach statistical significance for worsening (16% CRT-ON vs. 21% CRT-OFF, p=0.10), CRT-ON showed significant improvement in LV end-systolic volume index (p < 0.0001).
- CRT significantly reduced the risk of hospitalization for worsening heart failure (HR: 0.47, p=0.03).
- Positive trends in LV remodeling and functional status were observed with CRT.
Conclusions:
- CRT, alongside optimal medical therapy, is effective in reducing heart failure hospitalizations in NYHA class I/II patients.
- The therapy demonstrably improves ventricular structure and function in this patient population.
- The REVERSE trial supports the use of CRT for earlier stages of systolic left ventricular dysfunction.
Objectives:
We sought to determine the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II heart failure (HF) and NYHA functional class I (American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association stage C) patients with previous HF symptoms.
Background:
Cardiac resynchronization therapy improves left ventricular (LV) structure and function and clinical outcomes in NYHA functional class III and IV HF with prolonged QRS.
Methods:
Six hundred ten patients with NYHA functional class I or II heart failure with a QRS > or =120 ms and a LV ejection fraction < or =40% received a CRT device (+/-defibrillator) and were randomly assigned to active CRT (CRT-ON; n = 419) or control (CRT-OFF; n = 191) for 12 months. The primary end point was the HF clinical composite response, which scores patients as improved, unchanged, or worsened. The prospectively powered secondary end point was LV end-systolic volume index. Hospitalization for worsening HF was evaluated in a prospective secondary analysis of health care use.
Results:
The HF clinical composite response end point, which compared only the percent worsened, indicated 16% worsened in CRT-ON compared with 21% in CRT-OFF (p = 0.10). Patients assigned to CRT-ON experienced a greater improvement in LV end-systolic volume index (-18.4 +/- 29.5 ml/m2 vs. -1.3 +/- 23.4 ml/m2, p < 0.0001) and other measures of LV remodeling. Time-to-first HF hospitalization was significantly delayed in CRT-ON (hazard ratio: 0.47, p = 0.03).
Conclusions:
The REVERSE (REsynchronization reVErses Remodeling in Systolic left vEntricular dysfunction) trial demonstrates that CRT, in combination with optimal medical therapy (+/-defibrillator), reduces the risk for heart failure hospitalization and improves ventricular structure and function in NYHA functional class II and NYHA functional class I (American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association stage C) patients with previous HF symptoms. (REsynchronization reVErses Remodeling in Systolic Left vEntricular Dysfunction [REVERSE]; NCT00271154).
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
