Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Evaluation of Coronary Flow Reserve After Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion in Rats
Published on: June 28, 2019
Coronary flow reserve dysfunction in hemodialysis and kidney transplant patients
Yasar Caliskan1, Huseyin Oflaz, Mustafa Demirturk
1Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul School of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Insights
Coronary flow reserve (CFR) is reduced in both hemodialysis (HD) and renal transplant patients, indicating cardiovascular system impact. CFR is more severely impaired in HD patients, suggesting uremia-related microvascular disease.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Nephrology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Coronary flow reserve (CFR) assessment via trans-thoracic echocardiography is emerging in clinical research.
- Previous studies suggest impaired coronary microvascular function and reduced CFR in hemodialysis (HD) patients.
- A comparative analysis between HD patients and renal transplant recipients regarding CFR is lacking.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare coronary microvascular circulation in chronic HD patients and renal transplant recipients.
- To assess coronary flow reserve (CFR) using trans-thoracic Doppler harmonic echocardiography (TTDE).
- To investigate carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT) and plaque formation in these patient groups.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving 48 chronic HD patients, 27 renal transplant recipients, and 39 healthy controls.
- Assessment of CFR using TTDE in all participants.
- Evaluation of carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT) and focal plaque areas.
Main Results:
- Both HD and renal transplant groups exhibited significantly lower CFR values compared to controls (p = 0.00).
- CFR was significantly lower in the HD group (1.57 ± 0.32) than in the renal transplant group (1.89 ± 0.50, p = 0.01).
- Higher IMT was observed in HD patients (0.799 ± 0.218 mm) and renal transplant recipients (0.681 ± 0.148 mm) compared to controls (0.586 ± 0.163 mm), with HD patients showing greater IMT than transplant recipients (p = 0.01).
Conclusions:
- Reduced CFR detected by TTDE in renal transplant and HD patients may signify early cardiovascular system compromise.
- Coronary microvascular function, assessed by CFR, is more impaired in HD patients compared to renal transplant recipients.
- Uremia-associated microvascular disease is a potential cause for CFR impairment in HD patients.
Background:
The assessment of coronary flow reserve (CFR) by trans-thoracic echocardiography has recently been introduced into clinical studies. Impairment of coronary microvascular functions and decreased CFR detected by trans-thoracic Doppler harmonic echocardiography (TTDE) has recently been reported in hemodialysis (HD) patients, but there is no comparative study between HD patients and renal transplant recipients.
Methods:
The aim of our study was to evaluate coronary microvascular circulation in chronic HD patients and renal transplant recipients. Forty-eight chronic HD patients, 27 renal transplant patients and 39 normotensive healthy controls were studied for the assessment of CFR by TTDE. The carotid artery intima media thickness (IMT) and areas of focal plaque formation were also evaluated in all subjects.
Results:
CFR values were significantly lower in both the HD and renal transplant groups than in the control group (p = 0.00). CFR values (1.57 +/- 0.32 vs. 1.89 +/- 0.50, p = 0.01) were also significantly lower in the HD group than in the renal transplant group. In 43 of 48 (89.6%) HD patients, CFR was <2.0; however, in 16 of 27 (59.3%) renal transplant recipients it was <2.0 (p = 0.00). When the HD and renal transplant groups were divided into two subgroups, according to CFR measurements (CFR < 2 and > or =2), no significant differences were found with respect to coronary risk factors and left ventricular echocardiographic measurements. The IMT of the control group (0.586 +/- 0.163 mm) was significantly lower than the HD (0.799 +/- 0.218 mm) and renal transplant groups (0.681 +/- 0.148 mm; p = 0.00). The IMT of the HD patients (0.799 +/- 0.218 mm) was significantly higher than the renal transplant recipients (0.681 +/- 0.148 mm; p = 0.01).
Conclusions:
Renal transplant and HD patients had lower CFR values detected by TTDE, which may be regarded as an early finding of an affected cardiovascular system. CFR is more impaired in HD patients than renal transplant recipients. Uremia-associated microvascular disease may be responsible for CFR impairment in HD patients.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Hemodialysis III: Nursing Management
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
