Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Determining Soil-transmitted Helminth Infection Status and Physical Fitness of School-aged Children
Published on: August 22, 2012
Is there an association between bruxism and intestinal parasitic infestation in children?
Kranya Victoria Díaz-Serrano1, Carolina Brunelli Alvares da Silva, Sérgio de Albuquerque
1Department of Pediatric Clinics, Preventive and Community Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil. dkranya@forp.usp.br
Insights
This study found no link between intestinal parasitic infections and bruxism in children. Further research is needed to understand the causes of pediatric bruxism.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Dentistry
- Infectious Diseases
- Parasitology
Background:
- Bruxism in children is multifactorial.
- Intestinal parasitic infestations have been suggested as a potential cause of pediatric bruxism.
- Empirical evidence for this association is lacking.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between bruxism and intestinal parasitic infestation in children.
- To determine if parasitic infections contribute to the etiology of pediatric bruxism.
Main Methods:
- A case-control study involving 57 children aged 6-11 years.
- Bruxism diagnosis based on clinical examination and parent/guardian reports.
- Fecal samples analyzed for intestinal parasites using the spontaneous sedimentation method.
Main Results:
- Intestinal parasitic infestation was present in 30% of bruxism cases and 41% of controls.
- No statistically significant association was found between parasitic infestation and bruxism (P=.40).
Conclusions:
- The study findings do not support a link between intestinal parasitic infestation and bruxism in the pediatric population.
- The etiology of pediatric bruxism remains multifactorial and requires further investigation.
Purpose:
Multiple factors have been considered in the etiology of bruxism in pediatric patients, among which are infestations by intestinal parasites suggested by some authors. No empirical evidence exists, however, of such association. Therefore, this study's purpose was to investigate the existence of an association between bruxism and intestinal parasitic infestation in children.
Methods:
Fifty-seven 6- to 11-year-olds (30 cases and 27 controls) who had not used anthelminthics 2 months before the baseline examination were enrolled in the study. A diagnosis of bruxism was based on an intraoral clinical examination performed by a single trained examiner and on the parent/guardian's report of any perceived parafunctional habits (questionnaire-based interview). Bruxism cases were defined as those children with a report of currently perceived habits of eccentric or centric bruxism (tooth-grinding and tooth-clenching, respectively) combined with clinical evidence of nonphysiologic wear facets. The volunteers were required to collect 3 fecal samples (1 every 2 to 3 days). Parasitologic analysis was performed using the spontaneous sedimentation method. Data gathered from the intraoral clinical examination, questionnaire, and parasitologic analysis were tabulated and submitted to statistical analysis using the chi-square test and student's t test.
Results:
Intestinal parasitic infestation was observed in 30% (N=9) of cases and 41% (N=11) of controls, but no statistically significant association was observed (P=.40).
Conclusion:
This study's findings do not support the existence of an association between intestinal parasitic infestation and bruxism among the evaluated pediatric population.
Related Concept Videos
Giardiasis
Gut-Brain Axis
Development of the Oral Microbiota
The Oral Microbiota
Anatomy of the Intestines
Small Intestines
The small intestine is an ~7 meter-long tube with an inner diameter of just 2.5 cm. Since most nutrients are absorbed here, the inner lining of the small...
Bulimia Nervosa

