Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Murine Appendectomy Model of Chronic Colitis Associated Colorectal Cancer by Precise Localization of Caecal Patch
Published on: August 24, 2019
An evidence-based definition for perforated appendicitis derived from a prospective randomized trial.
Shawn D St Peter1, Susan W Sharp, George W Holcomb
1Department of Surgery, The Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA. sspeter@cmh.edu
A new definition for perforated appendicitis, identifying a hole or fecalith, improves patient risk assessment. This evidence-based approach helps reduce unnecessary treatment for patients without perforation risk, lowering abscess rates.
Area of Science:
- General Surgery
- Surgical Outcomes
- Infectious Disease
Background:
- Appendicitis is a common surgical emergency with no standardized definition for perforation.
- Retrospective studies on perforated appendicitis lack reliability due to an undefined denominator.
- Surgeon's opinion, not evidence, previously determined appendicitis perforation status.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish an evidence-based definition for perforated appendicitis.
- To investigate the safety and efficacy of a strict definition of perforation by comparing abscess rates before and after its implementation.
- To determine if the new definition accurately identifies patients at risk for postoperative abscess formation.
Main Methods:
- A prospective randomized trial was conducted over two years (starting April 2005) to evaluate two antibiotic regimens for perforated appendicitis.
- A strict definition of perforation (hole in appendix or fecalith) was applied prospectively.
- Laparoscopic appendectomy patient records from the two years before and two years after the definition's implementation were compared, excluding interval and incidental appendectomies.
Main Results:
- The study compared 131 perforated appendicitis cases before the definition to 161 after, and 292 nonperforated cases before to 388 after.
- The abscess rate in perforated appendicitis cases slightly increased from 14% to 18% after the definition was implemented.
- Crucially, the abscess rate in patients treated as nonperforated decreased significantly from 1.7% to 0.8% after the definition was adopted.
Conclusions:
- The defined criteria (hole in appendix or fecalith) effectively identify patients at risk for postoperative abscesses.
- Implementing this evidence-based definition allows for a targeted reduction in therapy for patients with purulent or gangrenous appendicitis who do not have perforation.
- This study presents the first evidence-based definition for perforated appendicitis, improving diagnostic accuracy and patient management.
Related Concept Videos
Appendicitis-I: Introduction
Etiology: Appendicitis can arise from various causes, primarily rooted in the obstruction of the appendix lumen. Factors contributing to this obstruction include fecal accumulation, lymphoid hyperplasia and, in...
Appendicitis
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations: