Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Intranasal Immunization and Milk Collection in Studies of Maternal Immunization in New Zealand White Rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus)
Published on: July 31, 2021
Challenges in mucosal vaccination of cattle
P E Shewen1, L Carrasco-Medina, B A McBey
1Department of Pathobiology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada. pshewen@uoguelph.ca
Mucosal vaccines for cattle, delivered orally via feed or intranasally, show promise against Mannheimia haemolytica. Oral vaccines leverage rumination, while intranasal vaccines are suitable for young calves, inducing specific antibodies.
Area of Science:
- Veterinary Immunology
- Vaccinology
- Infectious Disease Research
Background:
- Mucosal vaccines are crucial for combating infectious diseases entering through mucosal surfaces.
- Oral vaccination in ruminants faces challenges like antigen degradation in the rumen.
- Alternative mucosal delivery methods are being explored for cattle, particularly for respiratory pathogens like Mannheimia haemolytica.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate novel mucosal vaccine strategies for cattle against Mannheimia haemolytica.
- To compare the immunogenicity of orally-delivered and intranasally-delivered vaccines.
- To assess the potential for protection against experimentally induced pneumonia.
Main Methods:
- Calves were vaccinated orally with alfalfa expressing Mannheimia haemolytica antigen or intranasally with ISCOMs containing M. haemolytica antigens.
- Serum and nasal secretions were analyzed for specific antibodies (IgA and IgG) against leukotoxin (Lkt).
- Immunogenicity was compared to a commercial subcutaneous vaccine and experimental challenge models.
Main Results:
- Oral vaccination with antigen-expressing alfalfa increased anti-Lkt IgA in nasal secretions.
- Intranasal vaccination with ISCOMs induced Lkt-specific IgA in nasal secretions.
- Subcutaneous vaccination with ISCOMs induced Lkt-specific IgG in serum and nasal secretions, unlike a commercial vaccine.
Conclusions:
- Both oral and intranasal mucosal vaccination routes can induce specific immune responses in cattle.
- Leveraging rumination for oral delivery or using intranasal ISCOMs are viable strategies.
- Challenges remain in assessing long-term immunogenicity and efficacy against experimental infections.
Related Concept Videos
Mucosal Barrier of the Stomach
Within parietal cells, carbonic acid is first formed through the reaction of water and carbon dioxide. The dissociation of carbonic acid releases bicarbonate and hydrogen ions. The bicarbonate...
Vaccinations
Vaccine Production
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance

